Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Good Police Work Foiled Terror Threat (Get A Bucket)
Star Tribune ^ | August 11, 2006 | Editorial Staff

Posted on 08/13/2006 5:54:29 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo

Experts characterize the terrorist threat foiled early Thursday in London as the "most serious" since Sept. 11, 2001. This was the real deal, about which details will become available as the investigation continues. Candidate George W. Bush loved to lampoon the Clinton administration's emphasis on law enforcement and the legal system as tools against terrorism. They were too wimpy for him; a good, strong military action against a terror-sponsoring state was more his kind of action. And so military action we got. In Afghanistan it was essential, but in Iraq it was not. There it has increased manyfold the number of terrorists targeting the United States and worldwide animosity toward it.

Meanwhile, patient, meticulous police work in Britain and elsewhere identified and monitored this plot by a smallish, nonstate group of criminal terrorists until the need to take them down became urgent.

(Excerpt) Read more at startribune.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: londonairlineplot; wot
No doubt, British intelligence and their policing arms are to be praised for stopping this latest threat.

However, if the Bush administration had employed the same tactics to uncover this as did the Brits....this newspaper would have been the FIRST to decry their "illegal methods".

1 posted on 08/13/2006 5:54:30 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo
Oh please, Bush didn't "mock" the use of police, only treating the terror war as merely a law enforcement matter and nothing more. Bush never claimed police have no role in this effort. Far from it. He merely correctly commented on the Clinton predilection for making the fight against terrorism a one dimensional effort that involved only police work. But this plot was not broken because of indictments, but because of the kinds of surveillance techniques LIBERALS LIKE THIS WRITER OPPOSED that allowed Al Qaeda communictions to be monitored.
2 posted on 08/13/2006 6:00:57 PM PDT by MikeA (Not voting out of anger in November is a vote for Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeA

Very well put, Mike.


3 posted on 08/13/2006 6:04:18 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (Carry Daily, Apply Sparingly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo
Tsk, tsk. Playing politics with terrorism.

US law enforcement has stopped domestic plots since 9-11. The (accurate) criticism of Democrats is that they believe the ONLY response to terrorism is law enforcement--at home AND abroad.

4 posted on 08/13/2006 6:06:53 PM PDT by RedRover (Every election year is troll season.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo
The Brits were on the case cuz NSA did the intercepts.

NSA ain't zactly COPS, I think, but just as long as the job gets done...

5 posted on 08/13/2006 6:09:43 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson