Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Olmert acknowledges war's 'deficiencies'
AP on Yahoo ^ | 8/14/06 | AP

Posted on 08/14/2006 10:05:20 AM PDT by NormsRevenge

JERUSALEM - Israeli soldiers killed six Hezbollah fighters in four skirmishes in Lebanon after the U.N.-imposed cease-fire took effect Monday, the army said. Meanwhile, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said he took sole responsibility for the offensive, and acknowledged "deficiencies" in the way the war was conducted.

The developments came as Lebanese civilians defied an Israeli travel ban and streamed back to their homes in war-ravaged areas.

In an address to parliament, Olmert said the cease-fire agreement eliminated the "state within a state" run by Hezbollah and restored Lebanon's sovereignty in the south. And Defense minister Amir Peretz said the war opened a window for negotiations with Lebanon and renewed talks with Palestinians.

But many Israelis were upset by the high casualties during 34 days of fighting, and Benjamin Netanyahu, head of the opposition Likud Party, told lawmakers there were many failures in the war.

Olmert said: "We will have to review ourselves in all the battles," Olmert said. "We won't sweep things under the carpet."

Anticipating that another war with Hezbollah may come in the future, he said Israel will learn the lessons of this war and "do better."

For the first time in a month, no rockets were fired into northern Israel, but few Israelis who fled the war were seen returning, and Israel's government advised them to stay away for now to see whether the truce held.

Officials said four Hezbollah guerrillas were killed in two clashes near the town of Hadatha when armed men approached Israeli troops three hours after the cease-fire began, at 8 a.m. local time (1 a.m. EDT). Later clashes occurred near the towns of Farun and Shama, with one guerrilla killed in each, officials said.

"They were very close, they were armed, and they did pose a danger to the troops," said Capt. Jacob Dallal, a military spokesman. "We're going to shoot anybody who poses an imminent threat to the troops."

Dallal said the Israeli army was urging Lebanese civilians to stay out of the south until Lebanese troops and U.N. peacekeepers moved in to oversee the cease-fire.

"There are lots of Israeli troops and Hezbollah fighters. For their own safety, we advise them (civilians) not to go," Dallal said.

But Israeli Defense Minister Amir Peretz said at midafternoon that aside from the isolated skirmishes with Hezbollah, the cease-fire was holding and could have implications for future relations with Israel's neighbors.

Lebanese, Israeli and U.N. officers met on the border to discuss the withdrawal of Israeli forces from southern Lebanon and the deployment of the Lebanese army in the region, U.N. spokesman Milos Strugar said.

The meeting, the first involving a Lebanese army officer and a counterpart from the Israeli army since Israeli forces withdrew from Lebanon in 2000, marks the first step in the process of military disengagement as demanded by a U.N. Security Council resolution.

The next step in the peace effort — sending in a peacekeeping mission — appeared days away. The head of the existing U.N. force in Lebanon said Monday he wants reinforcements "as soon as possible," and warned that situation remains fragile.

French Maj. Gen. Alain Pellegrini, who leads the 2,000-member UNIFIL force in southern Lebanon, said in a telephone interview with The Associated Press that the region is "not safe from a provocation, or a stray act, that could undermine everything."

The fighting persisted until the last minutes before the cease-fire took effect Monday morning, with Israel destroying an antenna for Hezbollah's TV station and Hezbollah guerrillas clashing with Israeli forces near the southern city of Tyre and the border village of Kfar Kila.

Israeli warplanes struck a Hezbollah stronghold in eastern Lebanon and a Palestinian refugee camp in the south, killing two people, and Israeli artillery pounded targets across the border through the night.

After the cease-fire took effect, lines of cars — some loaded with mattresses and luggage — snaked slowly around bomb craters and ruined bridges as residents began heading south to find out what is left of their homes and businesses.

Israel has not lifted its threat to destroy any vehicle on the roads of most of south Lebanon. But Peretz said Monday afternoon that aside from isolated skirmishes with Hezbollah, the cease-fire was holding and could have implications for future relations with Israel's neighbors.

In some places in the south, the rubble was still smoldering from a barrage of Israeli airstrikes just before the cease-fire took effect at 8 a.m. (1 a.m. EDT).

"I just want to find my home," said Ahmad Maana, who went back to Kafra, about five miles from the Israeli border, where whole sections of the town were flattened.

In Beirut's southern suburbs, a Hezbollah stronghold, people wrapped their faces with scarves as wind kicked up dust from the wreckage left by Israeli bombardments. Ahmed al-Zein poked through the ruins of his shop.

"This was the most beautiful street in the neighborhood," he said. "Now it's like an earthquake zone."

There were no reports of Israeli strikes on cars Monday — a sign Israel did not want to risk rekindling the conflict. But at least one child was killed and 15 people were wounded by ordnance that detonated as they returned to their homes in the south, security officials said.

The rush to return came despite a standoff that threatened to keep the cease-fire from taking root. Israeli forces remain in Lebanon, and Hezbollah's leader, Sheik Hassan Nasrallah, said the militia would consider them legitimate targets until they leave.

A Lebanese Cabinet minister told Europe-1 radio in France that Lebanese soldiers could move into the southern part of the country as early as Wednesday. The U.N. plan calls for a joint Lebanese-international force to move south of the Litani River, about 18 miles from the Israeli border, and stand as a buffer between Israel and Hezbollah militia.

"The Lebanese army is readying itself along the Litani to cross the river in 48 to 72 hours," said Lebanese Communications Minister Marwan Hamade.

A United Nations force that now has 2,000 troops in south Lebanon is due to be boosted to 15,000 soldiers, and together with a 15,000-man Lebanese army contingent is to take control of the border area.

France and Italy, along with predominantly Muslim Turkey and Malaysia, signaled willingness to contribute troops to the peacekeeping force, but consultations are needed to hammer out the force's makeup and mandate.

Officials said Israeli troops would begin pulling out as soon as the Lebanese and international troops start deploying to the area. But it appeared Israeli forces were staying put for now. Some exhausted soldiers left Lebanon early Monday and were being replaced by fresh troops.

Israel also would maintain its air and sea blockade of Lebanon to prevent arms from reaching Hezbollah guerrillas, Israeli army officials said.

Olmert gave the order Sunday to halt firing as of Monday morning, his spokesman Asaf Shariv said. However, "if someone fires at us we will fire back," he added.

Isaac Herzog, a senior minister in the Israeli Cabinet, said it was unlikely all fighting would be silenced immediately. "Experience teaches us that after that a process begins of phased relaxation," in the fighting, he said.

Just three hours after the cease-fire, Israeli troops fired on a group of Hezbollah militiamen approaching "in a threatening way," the army said. One Hezbollah fighter was hit, but it was not known if he was killed or wounded.

Israeli troops later shot a Hezbollah fighter aiming his rifle at them near the village of Ghanduriya. The army did not say if the man was killed.

No fighting was reported elsewhere.

In Bint Jbail, a border town that was the scene of heavy ground battles between guerrillas and Israeli soldiers, an entire swath of the town center was flattened and rows of cars sat incinerated in the streets. An Israeli tank was parked on the road outside the town.

In Beirut, street life cautiously returned. Traffic was heavier and some stores reopened.

Thousands of vehicles, meanwhile, crept south along bomb-blasted highways. At a key intersection, traffic was backed up for more than a half mile as police tried to direct vehicles around bomb craters.

Many parts of southern Lebanon have been virtually deserted for weeks after a wave of refugees headed north to escape the fighting.

Similar scenes took place in northern Israel, which had been hit by more than 4,000 Hezbollah rockets that forced people to flee or huddle in bomb shelters. Some Israelis cautiously tried to sample small bits of normal life: shopping for groceries or taking a stroll in the sun after weeks in shelters.

In Haifa, Israel's third-largest city and a frequent Hezbollah target, stores that had been closed for weeks began to reopen, and a few people returned to the beaches.

However, in Kiryat Shemona, where more than half the 22,000 residents fled some 700 Hezbollah rocket attacks, the streets were mostly empty. Residents stirred from their bomb shelters, but there was no influx of returning refugees.

"People are still scared," said Haim Biton, 42, predicting that things would not get back to normal soon. "You don't know what's going to happen."

"The city is still in a coma," said Shoshi Bar-Sheshet, the deputy manager of a mortgage bank. Getting back to normal, she said, "doesn't happen overnight."

Both Hezbollah and Israel claimed they had come out ahead in the conflict.

Hezbollah distributed leaflets congratulating Lebanon on its "big victory" and thanking citizens for their patience during the fighting, which began July 12 when guerrillas killed three Israeli soldiers and captured two others in a cross-border raid.

Israeli Foreign Ministry spokesman Mark Regev said Hezbollah's "state within a state" had been destroyed, along with its ability to fire at Israeli soldiers across the border.

Peretz said that as a result of the war Islamic extremists have been weakened, opening a window for negotiations with Lebanon and for renewing talks with Palestinians.

Lebanon said nearly 791 people were killed since the fighting began. Israel said 116 soldiers and 39 civilians were killed in fighting or from Hezbollah rockets.

___

Associated Press writers Kathy Gannon in Bint Jbail, Lebanon; Arthur Max in Jerusalem; and Zeina Karam in Beirut, Lebanon, contributed to this report.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; Israel; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2006israelwar; acknowledges; deficiencies; hezbollah; lebanon; olmert
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 08/14/2006 10:05:23 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Bye Bye Olmert - there are always repercussions to giving away Israel's Land.


2 posted on 08/14/2006 10:09:06 AM PDT by richardtavor (Pray for the peace of Jerusalem in the name of the G-d of Jacob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: richardtavor

Olmert = loser.


3 posted on 08/14/2006 10:15:13 AM PDT by sine_nomine (President Bush: Build that wall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
I don't understand why Olmert refused to allow the blitz of South Lebanon by the ground forces, which I understand was the contingency plan in place.

Reminds me of McNamara trying to fight Vietnam with "restraint."

4 posted on 08/14/2006 10:19:06 AM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; richardtavor
Meanwhile, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said he took sole responsibility for the offensive, and acknowledged "deficiencies" in the way the war was conducted.

A person of character would not just mouth that empty phrase, but would resign from office and call for new elections. Don't hold your breath waiting for Foolmert to do this, mainly because he lacks the character on many levels.

Bye Bye Olmert - there are always repercussions to giving away Israel's Land.

I hope that such a repercussion occurs SOON. Israel needs a Churchill, not a Chamberlain as its leader. Actually, it needs a Joshua, but there have been precious few like him in history.

5 posted on 08/14/2006 10:21:17 AM PDT by Ancesthntr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr

A person of character would put a 9 mm in his mouth and pull the trigger.


6 posted on 08/14/2006 10:32:34 AM PDT by stop_fascism
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker

I suspect there was some legitimate fear that Israel's casualties would be unacceptably high in such a scenario.


7 posted on 08/14/2006 10:42:03 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
Reminds me of McNamara trying to fight Vietnam with "restraint."

This is why it is generally a Very Bad Idea to allow libs to conduct a war. War is not supposed to be a gentle thing - it is supposed to be violent and nasty, which is why sane and moral people and nations try to avoid them. But once the decision to fight is made, you have to be ruthless, to act as quickly and as violently as possible to win quickly, with as few casualties as possible. Liberals never have, and apparently never will, understand this. Gradually ramping up a war to "sent a signal" or to "be reasonable" does nothing but give the enemy time to dig in, to ramp up its own production, etc.

8 posted on 08/14/2006 10:57:02 AM PDT by Ancesthntr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
If the Israeli's are really thinking like that, they're doomed . They better pack their bags and move to Nevada.

The time to consider the casualties you're willing to take is before you start a war.

9 posted on 08/14/2006 10:57:22 AM PDT by stop_fascism
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: stop_fascism
A person of character would put a 9 mm in his mouth and pull the trigger.

Uh, maybe not. One should avoid comparisons with the last politician of note to do that. Only his political death is required.

10 posted on 08/14/2006 10:58:46 AM PDT by Ancesthntr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
I suspect there was some legitimate fear that Israel's casualties would be unacceptably high in such a scenario.

As opposed to what? The present situation, where over 100 Israelis have been killed, where the soldiers over whom this whole thing started are still held hostage, and where Israel's deterrent is destroyed, thereby making a future conflict nearly a guarantee?

Anyone with such poor judgment, who displays such naivete, has to be tossed from office.

11 posted on 08/14/2006 11:01:44 AM PDT by Ancesthntr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sine_nomine

"Olmert = loser"

Definition:

Waging war as William Jefferson Blythe Clinton Would Do
Caputulating like Trent Lott Would Do.

WANTED: Strong decisive PM for Israel. Lawyers/Car Salesmen need not apply


12 posted on 08/14/2006 11:01:48 AM PDT by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr

Giving him the Admiral Byng treatment would be a good object lesson for future PMs.


13 posted on 08/14/2006 11:02:34 AM PDT by stop_fascism
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: stop_fascism
That's not a commentary on Olmert's leadership. It's a limitation of Israel's political/economic reality.

When you've got all of northern Israel living in bomb shelters for weeks at a time and you've got a military force comprised largely of reserves like Israel does, any protracted military campaign of this kind basically results in a collapse of the nation's economy.

This is exactly what led Israel to withdraw from Lebanon in the first place a few years back, and it's the underlying impetus behind their decision to abandon Gaza and parts of the West Bank, too.

14 posted on 08/14/2006 11:14:54 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
"I suspect there was some legitimate fear that Israel's casualties would be unacceptably high in such a scenario."

That was it, plus the fact that what Israel always really wanted was for the UN to enforce 1559 or get a more beefed up international force. And that is what would be the best. Israel bombing the tar out of Lebanon is a bad thing for Israel and Lebanon. I hope Israel never has to raise a weapon against Lebanon again. I hope the ceasefire works. I hate to think of all this happening again. Why? It hurts everyone but Hezbollah.

I don't think the ceasefire is so terrible. On the contrary, it puts Hezbollah in the spot light if they attack Isreal again. It's like everyone thinks "Oh boy, Israel will kick the crap out of Hezbollah, no problem. Well it ain't that easy.

15 posted on 08/14/2006 11:17:13 AM PDT by Hound of the Baskervilles (A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr
"As opposed to what? The present situation, where over 100 Israelis have been killed, where the soldiers over whom this whole thing started are still held hostage, and where Israel's deterrent is destroyed, thereby making a future conflict nearly a guarantee?"

I am tired of this whining. Slap! Slap! Snap out of it!!!!!

16 posted on 08/14/2006 11:34:08 AM PDT by Hound of the Baskervilles (A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Olmert acknowledges war's 'deficiencies'

As opposed to his own?
17 posted on 08/14/2006 11:35:16 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (Freedom isn't free, but the men and women of the military will pay most of your share)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hound of the Baskervilles
I am tired of this whining. Slap! Slap! Snap out of it!!!!!

Meaning what, exactly? Do you think that Israel has been successful in accomplishing its goals in this conflict? Do you think that Israel has more, or less, of the world's nations on its side now vs. on 7/11? Do Israel and the IDF have more, or less, ability to deter conflict now vs. on 7/11?

I look forward to your response.

18 posted on 08/14/2006 11:53:07 AM PDT by Ancesthntr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Hound of the Baskervilles
what Israel always really wanted was for the UN to enforce 1559

And what I really want is for the UN to send me a couple million bucks. I'd say I have a better chance of my want becoming a reality than does Israel. The UN can be divided into three parts: 90% that would like Israel destroyed, 10% that doesn't give a flying ____ about Israel, and the US and Israel.

"Putting the spotlight on Hezbollah" is just what the hezbos want. You and I might think the light shines on blood thirsty thugs, but the Muslim world sees some really cool guys.

19 posted on 08/14/2006 12:04:22 PM PDT by stop_fascism
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

You have a point. The Israelis elected Olmert, afterall. They knew what they were getting. Maybe this will wake them up. If not, the entire state of Israel will fit into Nevada without inconveniencing any Muslims.


20 posted on 08/14/2006 12:07:13 PM PDT by stop_fascism
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson