Thanks for a great post.
What is "mainstream" about such a biased media that continually tries to impose its socialist agenda on us? I propose we no longer refer to them as mainstream or MSM. Rush is using Drive-by Media.
Public disclosure: Media are finally admitting their biases.
D.C. journalists favor Kerry 12 to 1: N.Y. Times informal poll confirms media lean left
Creator of 'Mr. Sterling' Admits: We TV Writers Are '99% Leftist'
Professor's Study Shows Liberal Bias in News Media
No Bias in Media, ha ha, tee hee
-Poll confirms Ivy League liberal tilt--
From my own files:
-The Old Grey Info-Slut... the NYT/Jayson Blair Affair--
-The Access of Evil-- CNN's Duplicity --
-That "Rush" to Judgment- Limbaugh Links--
Scams, Scalawags, and an all-too-gullible Public...famous frauds sold to America
-The lies of Paul Krugman-( BLAIR, BRAGG, DOWD ... KRUGMAN? ) --
-60 Minutes to Infamy- those forged memos and The Shot Heard Round the World--
Fred is preaching to the choir here. The ironic thing about Barne's article is not only is it obvious to conservatives, but I doubt it will be read by the very people who could benefit from this not-so-new info: average non-conservative Americans. Most Americans I know firmly believe they get all the pertinent (and true) info they need from their local rag or the alphabet networks. They scarcely realize not only how much they're lied to, but also all the info they DON'T get.
bookmark