Replies

"Methinks you're the one who's pals with Lamont"

I am the one working for Lamont's defeat.
You are the guy workimg for Lamont to win.
BIG difference.

Nobody here has endorsed Lamont no matter how much you'd like to pretend they are. You can whine all your want that people have to support your 95% liberal candidate or else they're somehow helping the 100% liberal candidate, but nobody's buying your agreement.

This is a conservative forum and we do not root for one ultra-socialist's "victory" over another ultra-socialist's "victory". We OPPOSE Liebermont for that seat.

YOU agree with Lamont that a win for socialist Lieberman is a "victory" for President Bush and the GOP. Since it YOU and not me who has bought into Lamont's looney and throughly-discredited talking points, you should just formerly join the RAT party and get it over with.

The pro-Hillary wing of the Dems appriciate your support. The Hilderbeast is currently being attacked over at DU, Daily Kos, etc., for her support of the war but I'm sure a good patriot like you welcomes the "victory" of a fanatically pro-abortion, gun-grabbing, tax and spend commie as long as they vote the "right way" on the WOT. Hillary has anti-war opponents in both the primary and the general election, and Republicans never "win" in New York, so if you welcome Lieberman's victory you'll just luuuuuuuuuuuv Hillary.

As evidenced by Lieberman's vote totals in the primary, roughly 48% of Dems share your "values" and work towards the election of pro-WOT socialists. Joe Lieberman, Hillary Clinton, and Diane Feinstein welcome you into thier ranks.

Do you live in Conn.? I doubt it. So just HOW are you "working for Lamont's defeat"? By berating someone ( me ), who is more Conservative, more knowledgeable, and a far longer member of FR?

You're pathetic !