Dark Matter?
I find it interesting how quantum physicists and string theorists keep getting more and more bizarre in order to explain themselves and stopgap problems with their theories. Strange, up, down, one-handed clap, 26 dimensions, electron probabilities that include orbitals from your eye to Jupiter (or the other side of the Universe and back), virtual particles, quantum orbital....and the list goes on.
Occam's Razor: All things being equal, the simplest solution is most likely.
Stochastic Electrodynamics (SED) is that simplest solution. It simply gives credit to two simple principles. 1) The universe is pure energy, and 2) E=mc^2 or more precisely E(e0,u0)=mc^2.
All SED states is that energy in its simplest form is electromagnetic waves, and zero-point energy (ZPE) is the ground state (QED recognizes this as well but excludes it from their equations since cannot be measured - even the measuring rod will contain the same ZPE. ZPE has received a bad rap lately because it has been used by bogus scientists to try to make bogus claims like cold fusion and endless energy sources).
Matter on the other hand is, using a simple analogy, like knots on a wound rubber band. Matter is a state of energy, balled up (simply speaking). Matter can disintegrate back into pure ZPE..
The amount of energy contained in matter is governed by the well know equation E=mc^2, which again is more precisely show as a function of the electric and magnetic constants (which are not constant in SED, explained later).
Like the knots that form on a rubber band, matter forms in very specific knots that we see as particles.
The formation of matter occurred during the high energy state at the beginning of the universe. As the universe expands the total energy spreads out and matter slowly over time reverts back to energy (we see this experimentally)
Unlike electromagnetic waves we're used to, ZPE is on what is called a plank length scale. It is fundamentally the lowest state of energy.
This is where it gets interesting. Imagine a large explosion. Energy proceeds from ground zero outward. At any point in time with the right equipment, one can measure the energy gradient with respect to time. As one approaches the leading shock wave (the event horizon) the energy gradient becomes asymptotic.
The universe is just such a model. In other words, if one could image an initial explosion (ie the big bang), high energy in the form of mass would expand. As the energy drops (ie as the event horizon expands) the energy level eventually approaches zero, and as it does matter eventually disintegrates back into pure energy. In local space, the rate of decay of particles is relatively slow (particles are not being formed as they would be in a very high energy density, and particle stability or equilibrium has long passed)
The point to notice is that along the energy gradient the energy density is not constant. Today QED cannot explain this since it would alter every constant known. Take Mu for example (see article http://www.nat.vu.nl/~wimu/Natconst.pdf), the ratio of the mass between a proton and an electron. This should be constant according to QED, but it is “now” observed to vary. Why?
The reason is QED is a special state of SED. In other words, SED is the macro view and QED is the micro view...on the scale of the universe.
A simple hydrogen atom, for example, has a single proton and a single electron. It is thought in QED that the electron orbits at a specific ground-state (give or take, for those looking to find fault, - Lamb shift and other minor variations). But that is because, until now, that is the way it is seen here on earth and as far as we could see with the spectral instrumentation we have.
But, "Old Photons Shed New Light". As we are now able to look out 12 billion light years and perform very precise spectral analysis, what we see is a shift in the ground-state of the hydrogen atom as if the predictable QED state is not as constant as we thought.
The reason for this is ZPE. ZPE density determines the ground-state of all atomic structure. It is not homogeneous along the density gradient. ZPE density is lower toward the center of the universe and higher toward the event horizon. Now instead of using only Lamb shift, and Doppler Shift to observe atomic spectra, a non-linear shift due to ZPE density must be used as well.
In theory, using this non-linear shifting, an XYZ coordinate system can be used to map the heavens (vs the relative system we use today with Doppler and red shifting).
So how does this fit into the discussion of Dark Matter? The answer is there really is only energy, ZPE and the particles formed by it. SED is physics that requires no exotic explanations. It is simply Classical Newtonian Mechanics at its finest that allows us to connect the dots between Relativity and QED without all the machinations, one-handed claps, Zen, Tao, or other bizarre mental gymnastics to figure it out.
Too bad so many lives depend financially on QED and its complexity (to fool) those that fund. Job security, higher education, and smooth talking elitists will keep science moving down the wrong path for years until this revolution replaces the old guard as has been done so many times in history.
Interesting post. Thanks.
I agree with your first paragraph. Dark matter and all this other malarky reminds me of the arguements of how many angels can stand on the head of a pin.
However; regarding Occam's Razor, the simplest solution is that there was NO begining to the Universe. It has been here forever and will continue forever. No Big Bang, no collapsing universe, no Big Crunch, no infinite expansion (it is ALREADY an infinite expanse!)
It has evolved forever and will continue to evolve forever. It is definitely LOTS of energy, particles, collisions of particles, collisions of wave-fronts, electricity and magnetism leading to great electrical generators etc.
Read the "The Big Bang Never Happened" by Eric Lerner. Very informative.