Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RobbyS
The tradition is simply that marriage is an institution that has developed to provide care for human progeny

It has also developed for one spouse to provide care for the other. In addition, lesbians can have children; nothing prevents one or both of them getting knocked up and raising those kids together.

homosexual couple take away the resources of society that ought to go toward the rearing of children.

What resources are those?

the gays demand that the schools inculcate their sexual morality in children

I haven't seen this personally, but that I will fight against.

93 posted on 08/16/2006 1:27:29 PM PDT by psychoknk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]


To: psychoknk

But it developed specifically so that a male and female provide care for one another, with the view of producing children. Two men or two women don't need marriage provide for each other's needs; that is called friendship. A lebian relationshop cannot produce children. A women can have children, but she needs a male agent to produce them. It can be argued that a childless couple ought not to have certain tax breaks. Why multiply the incidence of childless unions? The California legislature is presently considering legislation that would require the schools to teach tolerance for the homosexual lifestyle.


95 posted on 08/16/2006 1:42:28 PM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson