Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sinkspur
I haven't heard anything about this ruling yet, but I am 100% confident anyhow that a federal judge did not rule that NSA surveillance is unconstitutional. I am certain that what you mean is that a federal judge ruled that warrantless NSA surveillance is unconstitutional.
19 posted on 08/17/2006 9:10:50 AM PDT by AntiGuv ("..I do things for political expediency.." - Sen. John McCain on FOX News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: AntiGuv
I haven't heard anything about this ruling yet, but I am 100% confident anyhow that a federal judge did not rule that NSA surveillance is unconstitutional. I am certain that what you mean is that a federal judge ruled that warrantless NSA surveillance is unconstitutional.

Unfortunately surveillance NSA-style is very often of the take-no-prisoners type. They collect it all and then search for key words and phrases. You cannot get a warrant against a single target for this type of surveillance because you looking at the full database of all the calls. Assuming that they find something of interest they look a little closer. There could easily be hundreds of thousands of such events every month (I'm guessing). Look harder and cut these down to a few thousand. Look harder and get them down to a hundred or less and off you go to the FISA court to get your warrants. If you kill the program at the top you will kill it at the bottom.

345 posted on 08/17/2006 12:50:05 PM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson