[Antoninus]

I was prepared to really hate Coulter's discussion of evolution--didn't even read it for weeks after I'd finished the rest of the book--but actually, it's quite interesting. I wondered how a biologist on the other team would respond. Now I see: He responds with the same malice he criticizes in Coulter herself, without once responding to her argument.

I felt exactly the same way. I think that evolution is the most reasonable explanation for animal speciation. But Coulter's writing on the subject was thought-provoking--particularly her expose on the treatment of Richard Sternberg by some within the scientific community, as well as her description of the Scopes Monkey Trial. Very informative stuff.

By writing a review of this variety, this guy is proving Coulter's point: If you step out of line with the Left's "creation myth", they will excoriate you and try to ruin your life.

[steve-b]

But Coulter's writing on the subject was thought-provoking--particularly her expose on the treatment of Richard Sternberg by some within the scientific community, as well as her description of the Scopes Monkey Trial. Very informative stuff.

Given the number of fabrications caught by Ichneumon (who is to Ann Coulter as Buckhead is to Dan Rather), it would be illogical to assume that there is any veracity to these accounts.