Well that clears up everything, now doesn't it? :^)
He does seem pretty exercised about Ann's brief, however. Jeepers, you'd think that the "central paradigm of biology" ought to be fairly bullet-proof, impervious to Ann's little slings and arrows. But I suspect folks like Coyne must have their own doubts about it; otherwise, why get down in the gutter and attack people who make astute objections and draw reasonable associations between neo-Darwinist theory and the devolution of Western culture?
Name calling doth not a reasonable argument make.
Many here seem somewhat exercised by the style of Coyne's writing, and perhaps rightly so.
Reading the review it is absolutely obviously a pastiche of Coulter's own style, and rather well done, in my honest opinion; replete with stylish ad hominem just like La Coulter's work. Great, if you like that kind of thing, and I would have expected the Coulter worshippers to lap it up. ;)
Two wrongs don't make a right however.
But Ms Coulter has done such for years. However, she's is a lawyer.