Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cheney: Idea Of Female President Not So Abstract As 2008 Nears
The Denver Channel ^ | 7:27 am MDT August 17, 2006 | The Associated Press

Posted on 08/17/2006 8:30:54 PM PDT by Solitar

ASPEN, Colo. -- The idea of a woman president is not so abstract now that the 2008 election nears, Lynne Cheney, wife of vice president Dick Cheney said Wednesday. "If you're thinking of Condi Rice, I think she has good credentials," Cheney said. During an appearance sponsored by the Aspen Institute, Cheney talked mostly about education and history but did venture into current politics, including the possibility of women running for president. She did not mention New York Sen. Hillary Clinton, widely thought to be considering a presidential run in 2008. "(National security) is the driving issue," Cheney said. "The stereotype exists that women are softer. Maybe it's not true. I don't think it's true. But it's a little bit of a challenge to overcome for a woman president."

(Excerpt) Read more at thedenverchannel.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; cheney; condi; condoleezza; electionpresident; president; rice; rice2008; womanpresident
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last
Again we see support from a person who can influence Condi and supporters of Condi for President.
1 posted on 08/17/2006 8:30:56 PM PDT by Solitar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Solitar

Condi has not shown any interest in running. To win, she'd have to really want the presidency.


2 posted on 08/17/2006 8:37:19 PM PDT by onyx (1 Billion Muslims -- "if" only 10% are radical, that's 100 Million who want to kill us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Solitar

Condi does not have enough balls to stand firmly against the terrorists, ...oh..wait a minute..well, you know what I mean.


3 posted on 08/17/2006 8:37:31 PM PDT by se_ohio_young_conservative ("The only thing we have to fear is fear itself" Franklin D. Roosevelt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Solitar

as long as she has the right position on social issues, fine. If not, no thanks.


4 posted on 08/17/2006 8:42:11 PM PDT by balch3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Solitar

If Condi is not aggressively and emphatically pro-life, forget it. I do not know her stance, and she does not have to take one, unless she is running.


5 posted on 08/17/2006 8:42:19 PM PDT by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx; King Moonracer; sageb1; hotshu; Darkwolf377; marron; builder; zarf; Locke_Lomond; ...

Condi is softening in her denials. Unlike in past years, lately she has been avoiding saying outright no (or so that has been posted elsewhere here). She is quite busy this year with Secretary of State duties. Next year may be a new ball game.


6 posted on 08/17/2006 8:43:23 PM PDT by Solitar ("My aim is not to pass laws, but to repeal them." -- Barry Goldwater)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Solitar

I've never been entirely comfortable with people saying it's time for this or that, when it comes to women in public office. When a woman who is qualified wants to run, she'll run on her record just like any man would. If she's the best candidate, she'll likely win.

Golda Miehr (sp?), Margaret Thatcher, Indura (sp?) Ghandi were each voted in by the majority of their electorate. Had a qualified woman come along sooner, I'll bet they would have won sooner.

Frankly, the last thing I'm going to think about is sex, if the opposing candidate hawks policies like the dems will this year. If a female candidate has a good grasp of the issues and make the right assurances, they'll get my vote. I'd wager that's the way it's been a lot longer than most people think it has.


7 posted on 08/17/2006 8:44:20 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Bring your press credentials to Qana, for the world's most convincing terrorist street theater.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Solitar

I think Condi would make an excellent Commander in Chief. National Security is my #1 issue in '08.


8 posted on 08/17/2006 8:44:41 PM PDT by Flora McDonald (got teufelhunden?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Solitar

Well, now that the NFL Commissioners job has been filled, Condi's free to become POTUS.


9 posted on 08/17/2006 8:46:23 PM PDT by TexasNative2000 (Thailand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx
To win, she'd have to really want the presidency.

Diplomacy includes being able to want things but not show it until the right time.

Kinda' like chess and poker.

Why become a major target for liberals/MSM any sooner than necessary?

10 posted on 08/17/2006 8:49:23 PM PDT by capt. norm (Bumper Sticker: Honk if you've never seen an Uzi shoot from a car window.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: onyx
To win, she'd have to really want the presidency.

President Gore wanted it more than candidate Bush. :)

11 posted on 08/17/2006 8:49:29 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (This space for rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Solitar
Next year may be a new ball game.

I still think Cheney may choose not to continue as VP in 2007 and the logical choice to replace him is .......

12 posted on 08/17/2006 8:52:24 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (This space for rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Solitar

I would vote for Condi over any democrat. I am not saying she is the best candidate, I am saying she would get my vote, I would never vote for a dem.


13 posted on 08/17/2006 8:52:53 PM PDT by calex59 (Hillary Clinton is dumber than a one eyed monkey with a brain tumor(credit to Harley69))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ikka
If Condi is not aggressively and emphatically pro-life, forget it.

Then based on what I have heard, you are likely to have to forget it. I don't think she is.

14 posted on 08/17/2006 8:53:44 PM PDT by Condor 63
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: capt. norm


I want her to run.
Timing is everything. You're right about that.


15 posted on 08/17/2006 8:56:13 PM PDT by onyx (1 Billion Muslims -- "if" only 10% are radical, that's 100 Million who want to kill us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette


LOL. I am glad we can laugh about it.


16 posted on 08/17/2006 8:58:21 PM PDT by onyx (1 Billion Muslims -- "if" only 10% are radical, that's 100 Million who want to kill us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Solitar

The question has never been about a woman as President.

The question is about a qualified woman to run as President.


17 posted on 08/17/2006 9:02:09 PM PDT by malia ("How do you get a ceasefire with terrorists"? John Bolton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Solitar

I'm a fan of the President Rice idea.

This is the most serious mention of it I've seen.


18 posted on 08/17/2006 9:02:47 PM PDT by stevestras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

Condi, of course, to replace Cheney as VP in 2007. Then she would be free to campaign for President. Condi could tear holes in the Democrat party by taking away major portions of the female and black vote.
Besides, she knows more about foreign policy than any of the governors or senators who may run for President. THAT is the major qualification, in my opinion, for a President.
Domestic stuff should be left to the States. I believe that Condi's position on abortion is just that -- leave such decisions to the States rather than the Federal Government. She is personally against abortion except in the most extreme cases.


19 posted on 08/17/2006 9:03:36 PM PDT by Solitar ("My aim is not to pass laws, but to repeal them." -- Barry Goldwater)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Flora McDonald

I used to think that too but recently she is going the way of the "politician". That is, peace at any cost, kissing the UN's ass etc. etc. She lost me as a voter unless she is the only thing the Repubs put up. I would vote for her over a Dem but that is all. Not even V.P. after this last several months. Just another of the same old , same old. (politician)


20 posted on 08/17/2006 9:16:17 PM PDT by fish hawk (Terror : in a cave in Afghanistan. Treason: in a cave-in , in the Democratic Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson