Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sunday Morning Talk Show Thread 20 August 2006
Various big media television networks ^ | 20 August 2006 | Various Self-Serving Politicians and Big Media Screaming Faces

Posted on 08/20/2006 5:11:18 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!

p>The Talk Shows



Sunday, August 20th, 2006

Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:

FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb., and Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y.; airport security consultant Rafi Ron; Rand Beers, former presidential counterterrorism adviser; Washington Nationals co-owner Mark Lerner.

MEET THE PRESS (NBC): Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz.

FACE THE NATION (CBS): Sen. Joe Lieberman, D-Conn.

THIS WEEK (ABC): Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass.; British Home Secretary John Reid; Spike Lee, director of the documentary "When the Levees Broke."

LATE EDITION (CNN) : Sens. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., and Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif.; Iraqi Industry Minister Fawzi al-Hariri.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; facethenation; fawzialhariri; feinstein; foxnewssunday; guests; hagel; kerry; lateedition; lieberman; lineup; marklerner; mccain; meetthepress; peterking; rafiron; randbeers; specter; sunday; talkshows; thisweek; washingtonnationals
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 541-558 next last
To: Timeout
"What does 'clear up' mean? Are you implying they just mistakenly shipped the weapons? That it's all a misunderstanding? When you and your colleagues say we need to 'talk' or 'clear things up' or that 'threats don't work'---that's just meaningless drivel. Before Americans can take you seriously, you need to put some specific proposals on the table. Implying that the enemy would be satisfied with 'talk' is childish at best and mortally dangerous at worst".

Good post.


261 posted on 08/20/2006 8:54:20 AM PDT by HawaiianGecko (Timing has a lot to do with the outcome of a rain dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter

#139, I agree with your conclusions for the most part,but until the New Media takes over the DBM completely we have to struggle to get the truth out there.


262 posted on 08/20/2006 8:54:26 AM PDT by samantha (cheer up, the Adults are in charge,but need Reserves really fast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: bray

IF I'm not mistaken, Specter signalled on CNN that he has no intention of forwarding a statutory remedy to the question of FISA/NSA intelligence gathering.

Rather, he said this needs to get to the Supreme Court. So, not only will Specter not propose legislation that could put the Dems on serious defense right before the election. He's abandoning this important question to the whims of SCOTUS.


263 posted on 08/20/2006 8:55:30 AM PDT by Timeout (I hate MediaCrats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: Timeout; HawaiianGecko
I'm pointing out the hypocracy of those who've demanded just such a route for so many years. Then---when Bush trys it their way and the result is exactly what conservatives predicted--- they blame Bush.

The President should have known better, regardless of what the "diplomacy at all costs" libs say. If he doesn't punish the French for their duplicity, he is the loser of credibility in this one.

I still believe though, that this was a victory for Israel, not the defeat the media would like it to be. They spanked Hezbollah soundly, pushed them away from the border, and got a committment to have Hezbollah disarmed. The Israelis argument in support of yesterdays raid is an example of how the Israelis are going to play this.

264 posted on 08/20/2006 8:56:14 AM PDT by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok

Thanks, Phsst. I have downloaded FireFox. From things I read here, it seems it has many very nice features that I have absolutely no ability to figure out. I have even read their "Getting Started" information and learned nothing. The internet can make me feel very dumb sometimes.

The thing that I hate most about it is, if I am following a thread and hit refresh, it takes me to the last post and I have to scroll back up to see what I missed.


265 posted on 08/20/2006 8:56:31 AM PDT by Bahbah (Goldwasser, Regev and Shalit, we are praying for you...and now Steve and Olaf.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: HawaiianGecko

Yeah, but unfortunately no Republican is saying that.


266 posted on 08/20/2006 8:56:39 AM PDT by Timeout (I hate MediaCrats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: bray
According to the DinocRat Partyers,[and McCain and Graham] it is more important to protect Al Queda "Rights" than to protect American Lives.

I just had to point out that it's not just the dems.

267 posted on 08/20/2006 8:59:03 AM PDT by Bahbah (Goldwasser, Regev and Shalit, we are praying for you...and now Steve and Olaf.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!
For President Bush, they've been muffling or just not reporting his speeches, comments, defenders' comments, etc.

The appearance then is [President]Bush isn't defending himself, whereas in reality he is, but the media is just not letting you or I hear it.

Thank you!

268 posted on 08/20/2006 9:01:02 AM PDT by Just A Nobody (NEVER AGAIN..Support our Troops! www.irey.com and www.vets4Irey.com - Now more than Ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter

The Dems haven't been framing the debate, the driveby media has. Then again, the DBM has become so partisan that they might as well BE the Dems.

Still, we all say the Republicans are not doing enough of this, or their opponets are doing that, when in reality the supposedly non-partisan Fourth Estate have become the arbitrators of what is or isn't newsworthy, the judges of what is or isn't partisan, and the jury on the rightness and wrongness of political thought.

The media has taken a side and because of this they are not accurately, fairly, nor objectively reporting what is happening.


269 posted on 08/20/2006 9:01:15 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

Point taken and is exactly the reason they will not be President and VP.

Pray for W and Our Freedom Fighters


270 posted on 08/20/2006 9:03:26 AM PDT by bray (Koffi 4 Food has Failed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok
LMAO

George Carlin on Russert. Now that's funny. Talk about credentials.

Gee, I am dying to know how Mr. Carlin feels about the SCOTUS. How does he feel about the NSA? About Illegal Immigration? Nafta?

And after he speaks we will have the penultimate data. The trash-heep will have spoken.

No need to speak to Pee Wee Herman now.
271 posted on 08/20/2006 9:04:15 AM PDT by HonestConservative ((It's SNOWING!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
You'd be hard press to find someone with a rating to the right of Peter King.
Peter King is a Libertarian-Leaning Conservative.
Click here for explanation of political philosophy.

 

VoteMatch Question & Answer
(Click on question for explanation and background)
Based on these stances:
(Click on topic for excerpt & citation)
Strongly Opposes topic 1:
Abortion is a woman's right
(0 points on Social scale)
Rated 0% by NARAL, indicating a pro-life voting record: Strongly Opposes topic 1
YES on barring transporting minors to get an abortion: Strongly Opposes topic 1
YES on banning partial-birth abortions: Opposes topic 1
YES on banning Family Planning funding in US aid abroad: Opposes topic 1
YES on Unknown roll call for 2001-304: Strongly Opposes topic 1
YES on federal crime to harm fetus while committing other crimes: Opposes topic 1
YES on funding for health providers who don't provide abortion info: Opposes topic 1
YES on banning partial-birth abortion except to save mother’s life: Strongly Opposes topic 1
YES on making it a crime to harm a fetus during another crime: Opposes topic 1
YES on restricting interstate transport of minors to get abortions: Strongly Opposes topic 1
NO on allowing human embryonic stem cell research: Opposes topic 1
Opposes topic 2:
Require companies to hire more women & minorities
(7 points on Economic scale)
NO on ending preferential treatment by race in college admissions: Favors topic 2
NO on $84 million in grants for Black and Hispanic colleges: Strongly Opposes topic 2
Strongly Opposes topic 3:
Sexual orientation protected by civil rights laws
(0 points on Social scale)
YES on banning gay adoptions in DC.: Opposes topic 3
YES on Constitutional Amendment banning same-sex marriage: Strongly Opposes topic 3
Strongly Favors topic 4:
Teach family values in public schools
(0 points on Social scale)
Supports anti-flag desecration amendment: Favors topic 4
Rated 76% by the Christian Coalition: a pro-family voting record: Strongly Favors topic 4
YES on giving federal aid only to schools allowing voluntary prayer: Strongly Favors topic 4
YES on Unknown roll call for 2001-232: Favors topic 4
YES on allowing school prayer during the War on Terror: Strongly Favors topic 4
YES on constitutional amendment prohibiting flag desecration: Favors topic 4
YES on protecting the Pledge of Allegiance: Favors topic 4
Opposes topic 5:
More federal funding for health coverage
(7 points on Economic scale)
Rated 33% by APHA, indicating a mixed record on public health issues: Neutral on topic 5
YES on establishing tax-exempt Medical Savings Accounts: Opposes topic 5
YES on Prescription drug coverage under Medicare: Opposes topic 5
NO on allowing reimportation of prescription drugs: Opposes topic 5
NO on capping damages & setting time limits in medical lawsuits: Favors topic 5
YES on limited prescription drug benefit for Medicare recipients: Opposes topic 5
YES on denying non-emergency treatment for lack of Medicare co-pay: Strongly Opposes topic 5
Strongly Favors topic 6:
Privatize Social Security
(10 points on Economic scale)
Rated 0% by the ARA, indicating an anti-senior voting record: Strongly Favors topic 6
Reduce taxes on Social Security earnings: Favors topic 6
NO on strengthening the Social Security Lockbox: Favors topic 6
YES on reducing tax payments on Social Security benefits: Favors topic 6
YES on raising 401(k) limits & making pension plans more portable: Favors topic 6
Strongly Favors topic 7:
Parents choose schools via vouchers
(10 points on Social scale)
Rated 18% by the NEA, indicating anti-public education votes: Strongly Favors topic 7
YES on vouchers for private & parochial schools: Strongly Favors topic 7
YES on allowing vouchers in DC schools: Favors topic 7
Favors topic 8:
Death Penalty
(2 points on Social scale)
Moratorium on death penalty; more DNA testing: Opposes topic 8
Require DNA testing for all federal executions: Strongly Opposes topic 8
More prisons, more enforcement, effective death penalty: Favors topic 8
NO on replacing death penalty with life imprisonment: Strongly Favors topic 8
YES on making federal death penalty appeals harder: Strongly Favors topic 8
NO on maintaining right of habeus corpus in Death Penalty Appeals: Favors topic 8
Strongly Favors topic 9:
Mandatory Three Strikes sentencing laws
(0 points on Social scale)
Rated 30% by CURE, indicating anti-rehabilitation crime votes: Strongly Favors topic 9
YES on more prosecution and sentencing for juvenile crime: Favors topic 9
YES on Unknown roll call for 1999-252: Favors topic 9
NO on funding for alternative sentencing instead of more prisons.: Strongly Favors topic 9
Favors topic 10:
Absolute right to gun ownership
(7 points on Social scale)
Rated D by the NRA, indicating a pro-gun control voting record: Strongly Opposes topic 10
YES on decreasing gun waiting period from 3 days to 1: Strongly Favors topic 10
YES on prohibiting suing gunmakers & sellers for gun misuse: Strongly Favors topic 10
YES on prohibiting product misuse lawsuits on gun manufacturers: Strongly Favors topic 10
Strongly Favors topic 11:
Decrease overall taxation of the wealthy
(10 points on Economic scale)
Reduce the capital gains tax : Strongly Favors topic 11
Phaseout the death tax: Strongly Favors topic 11
Rated 59% by NTU, indicating "Satisfactory" on tax votes: Neutral on topic 11
Repeal marriage tax; cut middle class taxes: Favors topic 11
YES on Unknown roll call for 2000-254: Favors topic 11
YES on eliminating the "marriage penalty": Favors topic 11
YES on $46 billion in tax cuts for small business: Favors topic 11
YES on Tax cut package of $958 B over 10 years: Favors topic 11
YES on reducing Marriage Tax by $399B over 10 years: Favors topic 11
YES on eliminating the Estate Tax ("death tax"): Favors topic 11
YES on making the Bush tax cuts permanent: Strongly Favors topic 11
YES on providing tax relief and simplification: Strongly Favors topic 11
YES on retaining reduced taxes on capital gains & dividends: Strongly Favors topic 11
Favors topic 12:
Illegal immigrants earn citizenship
(7 points on Economic scale)
Rated 0% by FAIR, indicating a voting record loosening immigration: Strongly Favors topic 12
YES on more immigrant visas for skilled workers: Favors topic 12
YES on extending Immigrant Residency rules: Favors topic 12
NO on reporting illegal aliens who receive hospital treatment: Strongly Favors topic 12
YES on preventing tipping off Mexicans about Minuteman Project: Strongly Opposes topic 12
Favors topic 13:
Support & expand free trade
(7 points on Economic scale)
Rated 39% by CATO, indicating a mixed record on trade issues: Neutral on topic 13
YES on 'Fast Track' authority for trade agreements: Strongly Favors topic 13
NO on Permanent Normal Trade Relations with China: Strongly Opposes topic 13
NO on withdrawing from the WTO: Strongly Favors topic 13
YES on implementing US-Singapore free trade agreement: Strongly Favors topic 13
YES on implementing free trade agreement with Chile: Strongly Favors topic 13
YES on implementing US-Australia Free Trade Agreement: Favors topic 13
YES on end offshore tax havens and promote small business: Opposes topic 13
YES on implementing CAFTA, Central America Free Trade: Strongly Favors topic 13
Strongly Opposes topic 14:
The Patriot Act harms civil liberties
(10 points on Social scale)
YES on making the PATRIOT Act permanent: Strongly Opposes topic 14
YES on continuing intelligence gathering without civil oversight: Strongly Opposes topic 14
Strongly Favors topic 15:
More spending on armed forces
(0 points on Economic scale)
Rated 22% by SANE, indicating a pro-military voting record: Strongly Favors topic 15
YES on $266 billion Defense Appropriations bill: Favors topic 15
YES on deploying SDI: Favors topic 15
YES on emergency $78B for war in Iraq & Afghanistan: Strongly Favors topic 15
YES on continuing military recruitment on college campuses: Favors topic 15
Opposes topic 16:
Stricter limits on political campaign funds
(7 points on Economic scale)
NO on banning soft money and issue ads: Opposes topic 16
YES on banning soft money donations to national political parties: Favors topic 16
NO on campaign finance reform banning soft-money contributions: Opposes topic 16
YES on restricting independent grassroots political committees: Opposes topic 16
Strongly Opposes topic 17:
Replace US troops with UN in Iraq
(10 points on Economic scale)
No US troops under UN command; more defense spending: Opposes topic 17
YES on $15.2 billion for foreign operations: Favors topic 17
NO on $156M to IMF for 3rd-world debt reduction: Opposes topic 17
YES on withholding $244M in UN Back Payments until US seat restored: Opposes topic 17
YES on authorizing military force in Iraq: Strongly Opposes topic 17
YES on reforming the UN by restricting US funding: Strongly Opposes topic 17
YES on declaring Iraq part of War on Terror with no exit date: Strongly Opposes topic 17
Opposes topic 18:
Replace coal & oil with alternatives
(7 points on Economic scale)
Rated 10% by the LCV, indicating anti-environment votes: Strongly Opposes topic 18
YES on starting implementation of Kyoto Protocol: Strongly Favors topic 18
YES on raising CAFE standards; incentives for alternative fuels: Strongly Favors topic 18
NO on prohibiting oil drilling & development in ANWR: Strongly Opposes topic 18
YES on authorizing construction of new oil refineries: Strongly Opposes topic 18
YES on scheduling permitting for new oil refinieries: Strongly Opposes topic 18
Favors topic 19:
Drug use is immoral: enforce laws against it
(2 points on Social scale)
NO on subjecting federal employees to random drug tests: Strongly Opposes topic 19
YES on prohibiting needle exchange & medical marijuana in DC: Strongly Favors topic 19
YES on military border patrols to battle drugs & terrorism: Strongly Favors topic 19
Strongly Favors topic 20:
Allow churches to provide welfare services
(0 points on Social scale)
Limit welfare to 2 years & cut welfare spending: Favors topic 20
YES on responsible fatherhood via faith-based organizations: Favors topic 20
YES on treating religious organizations equally for tax breaks: Strongly Favors topic 20

 

 


272 posted on 08/20/2006 9:04:46 AM PDT by HawaiianGecko (Timing has a lot to do with the outcome of a rain dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: Timeout
IF I'm not mistaken, Specter signalled on CNN that he has no intention of forwarding a statutory remedy to the question of FISA/NSA intelligence gathering.

Rather, he said this needs to get to the Supreme Court. So, not only will Specter not propose legislation that could put the Dems on serious defense right before the election. He's abandoning this important question to the whims of SCOTUS.

and I bet he very publicly files a "friend of the court" brief as head of the Judiciary Committee arguing that the NSA program is illegal (probably applauding the latest court ruling from the Carter judge).  This is all about his ego and feeling slighted because the President didn't ask his permission to defend the country. 

It's all about Arlen.

He knows he has a very short time left to live and he's very bitter that his legacy, to date, is as a laughing stock, boiled down to the "magic bullet" in the Warren Commission and using "Scottish law" to cover up for Clinton.

Truly sad spectacle.

273 posted on 08/20/2006 9:05:05 AM PDT by Phsstpok (Often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

That "refresh" problem with Firefox drove me crazy till I figured out how to bypass it.

Before refreshing, open a new tab and post a bump in the thread. Go to "my comments" and click on your "bump" post. The thread will come up at your marker and include the subsequent posts.


274 posted on 08/20/2006 9:05:07 AM PDT by Timeout (I hate MediaCrats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39

"I think you will find few here agree with your opinion."

That's why I keep repeating it.

"He is demonstrably a loose cannon."

A loose cannon can be a good thing, if it's firing. A still cannon is no good if it's not. McCain is the only candidate I know who might actually use America's full arsenal to defeat Islamofascism.


275 posted on 08/20/2006 9:05:29 AM PDT by zook ("We all knew someone in primary school who had a really powerful magnet")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: HonestConservative

LOL. Actually, George Carlin is just trash.


276 posted on 08/20/2006 9:05:46 AM PDT by Bahbah (Goldwasser, Regev and Shalit, we are praying for you...and now Steve and Olaf.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok
"I use FireFox exactly for this reason. You can make the font size on a web page as large as you need. If you have a mouse with a scroll wheel just hold down the control key and you can "scroll" the font size directly."

I just did that with my Explorer, and it did the same thing. Didn't know I could do that, Thanks!

277 posted on 08/20/2006 9:06:03 AM PDT by LZ_Bayonet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok; Bahbah

You can also increase the font size in IE go to View menu and then text size


278 posted on 08/20/2006 9:07:15 AM PDT by snugs ((An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

I completely disagree. I'd say that as of right now, McCain has the best shot at the nomination. You can point to all kinds of things he's done to upset conservatives. Well, the same goes for Rudy and just about every other viable potential GOP candidate. McCain will likely win every Republican primary where independents are allowed to vote.

Watch him win, and watch Freeper opinion turn around by this time in 2008.


279 posted on 08/20/2006 9:08:07 AM PDT by zook ("We all knew someone in primary school who had a really powerful magnet")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
People too weak to follow their own dreams will always find a way to discourage yours.


280 posted on 08/20/2006 9:08:19 AM PDT by Lady Jag (People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 541-558 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson