Michael Fumento (U.S. Army Airborne, 1978-82), a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute, has been embedded twice in Al Anbar.
To: Fighting Irish; eyespysomething
It's also the capital of Al Anbar province and a favorite stomping ground of al Qaeda in Iraq, led by Jordanian-born terrorist Abu Musab al Zarqawi until two 500 lb. bombs blew apart his hideout last Wednesday.
Was that just last Wednesday? It seems like a couple of months ago. How time flies. ...
Anyway, thanks for posting, good reading.
2 posted on
08/22/2006 6:44:23 AM PDT by
SittinYonder
(Ic þæt gehate, þæt ic heonon nelle fleon fotes trym, ac wille furðor gan,)
To: Fighting Irish
Assuming all this to be true, what should be the US response?
To: Fighting Irish
Dateline of this story is 6/19 - two months ago. It seems like most of the violence *now* is centered around Baghdad: I wonder if Zarqawi's demise has played a role in the apparent shift of the terrorists' focus.
6 posted on
08/22/2006 6:54:58 AM PDT by
bassmaner
(Hey commies: I am a white male, and I am guilty of NOTHING! Sell your 'white guilt' elsewhere.)
To: Fighting Irish
There are four minarets within sniping distance of Corregidor, and the gentlemen in these places of worship regularly shoot at the raised observation posts around the camp and sometimes into the camp itself.
Now I would pay to see video of our snipers knocking some of these minaret posted shooters down. I wonder if we are even doing that?
To: Fighting Irish
10 posted on
08/22/2006 8:15:00 AM PDT by
nj_pilot
To: Fighting Irish
"There are four minarets within sniping distance of Corregidor, and the gentlemen in these places of worship regularly shoot at the raised observation posts around the camp and sometimes into the camp itself."
It is outrageous that these mosques are allowed to remain standing. Or any other building that houses terrorists or their weapons. Not one drop of our soldiers' blood is worth this nonsense. This is not a winning tactic, it is appeasement.
Camp Corregidor sounds too much like the fire bases of old, with their search & destroy missions & no go restricted areas in the city. This is "hearts & minds" bullsh@t.
Our policy should be that ALL buildings containing terrorists or their weapons is subject to instant destruction or bulldozing - our choice. The people of Iraq, Afghanistan, & Lebanon, etc., need to be told clearly & often that if they are in close proximity to a terrorist or his weapons, their lives & property are in imminent danger. We will no longer refrain from attacking the terrorists because of so-called "innocent civilians".
11 posted on
08/22/2006 8:25:34 AM PDT by
Mister Da
(The mark of a wise man is not what he knows, but what he knows he doesn't know!)
To: Fighting Irish
Great read, thanks for posting. I'm sure people more qualified than I made the decision but I can't help but feel that had we publicly obliterated a mosque early on in this thing as an example much less of this would be happening. There has to be some middle ground between giving the enemy a propaganda victory as a destroyer of holy places and giving him a free sanctuary.
To: Fighting Irish
14 posted on
08/22/2006 11:17:32 AM PDT by
JoeGar
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson