Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Department of Defense study urges open source adoption
Ars Technica ^ | 8/20/2006 6:50:40 PM | Ryan Paul

Posted on 08/22/2006 10:17:37 AM PDT by AFreeBird

Department of Defense study urges open source adoption

8/20/2006 6:50:40 PM, by Ryan Paul

The Open Technology Development road map, a recently authored government report, advises Deputy Undersecretary of Defense Sue Payton to integrate a comprehensive open source strategy into defense department procurement and development policies. Written by consultants for Advanced Systems & Concepts in collaboration with major technology companies and the Open Source Software Institute, the 79-page report advocates adoption of open technologies, support for and adherence to open standards, and discusses topics like licensing and software project governance.

The report argues that the standard practices associated with purchasing of physical goods are not adequate or fully applicable to software. According to the report, the DoD is "limiting and restricting the ability of the market to compete for the provision of new and innovative solutions and capabilities" by "treating DoD-developed software code as a physical good." The report also points out that utilizing open source technology will force the commercial software industry to respond with greater agility and competitiveness.

In addition to promoting open technology, the authors of the report feel that the DoD can improve interoperability while increasing efficiency and productivity by creating standard policies for internal redistribution of code developed by contractors. The report states that "by not enabling internal distribution, DoD creates an arbitrary scarcity of its own software code, which increases the development and maintenance costs of information technology across the Department."

The report strongly cautions against proprietary vendor lock-in and discusses at length how open standards can facilitate interoperability between open source and proprietary systems, explaining that the DoD "needs to evaluate the impact that locking into one set of proprietary standards or products may have to its ability to react and respond to adversaries and more importantly, to technological change that is accelerating regardless of military conflict."

[... snip ...]


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: computers; opensource; software; technology
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last
This is an excerpt. Follow article link for full story.

Emphasis added by me on the last paragraph shown.

This should help shake up things in the software arena. Competition is good!

1 posted on 08/22/2006 10:17:38 AM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Technology/OSS PING


2 posted on 08/22/2006 10:18:15 AM PDT by AFreeBird (... Burn the land and boil the sea's, but you can't take the skies from me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird

Maybye they should just use that version of linux the NSA wrote.


3 posted on 08/22/2006 10:22:46 AM PDT by SDGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SDGOP
SE-Linux was an add on to Linux. Technically it is not written by the NSA. Currently SE-Linux is enabled in most distributions.
4 posted on 08/22/2006 10:24:35 AM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SDGOP
It's more than just Linux. It would cover open standards as well. Massachusetts is pushing ahead with adoption of ODF (ope document format) which will require that all office software vendors support the format - even M$.

I'm sure Bill is *issed.

5 posted on 08/22/2006 10:29:03 AM PDT by AFreeBird (... Burn the land and boil the sea's, but you can't take the skies from me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rdb3; chance33_98; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; Bush2000; PenguinWry; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; ...

6 posted on 08/22/2006 10:36:50 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird
I'm sure Bill is *issed.

As is our beloved RT.

7 posted on 08/22/2006 10:37:51 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

I think he's just *issed at everything.


8 posted on 08/22/2006 10:51:53 AM PDT by AFreeBird (... Burn the land and boil the sea's, but you can't take the skies from me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird

I read "open source adoption" and I had visions of knowing the entire genetic code of the baby before signing the papers, and being able to tinker with it if I wanted lighter hair or a taller kid...


9 posted on 08/22/2006 10:55:53 AM PDT by Doug Loss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doug Loss

Give em time. I'm sure they [genetists] are working on that very thing - Designer babies.


10 posted on 08/22/2006 10:58:10 AM PDT by AFreeBird (... Burn the land and boil the sea's, but you can't take the skies from me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird
I think the military should stay out of the adoption debate. When a child reaches 18 or so he should be told the truth ...

=o)

11 posted on 08/22/2006 11:16:41 AM PDT by GeronL (flogerloon.blogspot.com -------------> Rise of the Hate Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird
Yeah--but this is his beloved DoD--where he claims to work.

He's claiming that everyone is satisfied with Windows in the AF, which this article denies.

Hmmm. I wonder who's right?

12 posted on 08/22/2006 11:17:49 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird

" == I'm sure Bill is *issed. == "

When I worked for IBM, I HISSED at Bill frequently.


13 posted on 08/22/2006 11:48:22 AM PDT by MainFrame65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird

the new version of office supports both pdf and the new xml document format.


14 posted on 08/22/2006 12:02:15 PM PDT by SDGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird

It's a little late for everyone to be able to post NB4GE. Is someone asleep?


15 posted on 08/22/2006 2:30:03 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird
Makes sense to me. Why would anyone want to depend on proprietary software if it is unnecessary.
16 posted on 08/22/2006 3:32:59 PM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird

LOL are you guys desperate. So 3 guys sent some whitepaper to someone in the DoD back in April. LOL again.


17 posted on 08/22/2006 6:29:52 PM PDT by Golden Eagle (Buy American. While you still can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
He's claiming that everyone is satisfied with Windows in the AF

No, I didn't, follow your own link. Why must you lie?

18 posted on 08/22/2006 6:30:58 PM PDT by Golden Eagle (Buy American. While you still can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle
And we all know that the DoD never considers white papers to be viable considerations. I'm sure there was some white paper somewhere regarding linking computers together in some interconnected manner for sharing information, with redundancy built into the system.

That turned out to be a complete bust, huh?

19 posted on 08/22/2006 7:12:48 PM PDT by AFreeBird (... Burn the land and boil the sea's, but you can't take the skies from me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat
While posting the article is definitely NB4GE, you get the prize for actually stating it, and being NB4GE.

;-/

20 posted on 08/22/2006 8:34:57 PM PDT by AFreeBird (... Burn the land and boil the sea's, but you can't take the skies from me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson