To: ScubieNuc
Personally, I would rather not have it available in motel rooms . . . You do realize that--according to the majority posting on this thread--you have just placed yourself in the company of the Taliban!
To: madprof98
Personally, I would rather not have it available in motel rooms . . . You do realize that--according to the majority posting on this thread--you have just placed yourself in the company of the Taliban!
Nope. It's only at the point where she would attempt to make it impossible for anyone else to access it does the comparison apply...
To: madprof98
"You do realize that--according to the majority posting on this thread--you have just placed yourself in the company of the Taliban!"
Well, if someone thinks that, then they obvious haven't read much of what I write.
The sad part of what you write is the dumbing down of what words mean. I see conservatives and liberals throw this "Taliban" word around. Nobody that I know, Democrat/Republican/Christian etc., is proposing a "Taliban" response. If the Taliban didn't like what you did, they could have you imprisoned or killed, without a trial. Taliban is a Islamic dictatorship. Proposing changes to laws or objecting to such proposals are essential to a democratic republic.
Throwing "Taliban" or "Nazi" around carelessly, doesn't advance anyones cause. In fact, I think that it ultimately hurts everyone.
Sincerely
To: madprof98
I would rather it not available in motel rooms either.
But that doesn't make me a nannystater like you, because I have no intention of calling the Feds on the motels.
325 posted on
08/22/2006 7:55:07 PM PDT by
stands2reason
(ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson