Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal judge rejects Bush plan to log in Sequoia forest
ap on Riverside Press Enterprise ^ | 8/22/06 | Terence Chea - ap

Posted on 08/22/2006 12:07:25 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

SAN FRANCISCO - A federal judge ruled Tuesday that a Bush administration plan to allow commercial logging in the Giant Sequoia National Monument violates environmental laws.

U.S. District Court Judge Charles R. Breyer sided with environmental groups that sued the U.S. Forest Service over plans to manage the 328,000-acre preserve, home to two-thirds of the world's largest trees.

In the lawsuit filed last year, the Sierra Club and other conservation groups said the forest management plan was a scientifically suspect strategy meant to satisfy timber interests under the guise of wildfire prevention.

In September last year, Breyer issued a preliminary injunction to halt further logging in the national monument created by President Clinton in 2000.

The Forest Service had said the plan to allow "thinning" of some trees was aimed at meeting fire prevention goals.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: bush; environment; envirowackos; federaljudge; login; plan; rejects; sequoiaforest; sierraclub
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 08/22/2006 12:07:27 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
How many times do the wild fires have to burn out of control before the Eviro wackos wake up to reality that THEIR "Do nothing ever" mindset IS interfering in the management of forests?
2 posted on 08/22/2006 12:09:00 PM PDT by MNJohnnie ( Elections are more important then the feelings of the POS Cons (Perpetually Offended Syndrome))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Bush administration plan to allow commercial logging in the Giant Sequoia National Monument violates environmental laws.

So do Michael Moore and Helen Thomas.
3 posted on 08/22/2006 12:09:24 PM PDT by HEY4QDEMS (Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Breyer, Charles R.
Born 1941 in San Francisco, CA

Federal Judicial Service:
Judge, U. S. District Court, Northern District of California
Nominated by William J. Clinton on July 24, 1997, to a seat vacated by D. Lowell Jensen; Confirmed by the Senate on November 8, 1997, and received commission on November 12, 1997.

Education:
Harvard College, A.B., 1963

University of California, Berkeley, Boalt Hall School of Law, J.D., 1966

Professional Career:
Law clerk, Hon. Oliver Carter, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, 1966-1967
Counsel, Legal Aid Society of San Francisco, California, 1967
Assistant district attorney, District Attorney's Office, City & County of San Francisco, California, 1967-1973
Assistant special prosecutor, Watergate Special Prosecution Force, 1973-1974
Private practice, San Francisco, California, 1974-1979
Chief assistant district attorney, District Attorney's Office, City and County of San Francisco, California, 1979
Private practice, San Francisco, California, 1980-1997

Race or Ethnicity: White

Gender: Male


4 posted on 08/22/2006 12:10:03 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ......Help the "Pendleton 8' and families -- http://www.freerepublic.com/~normsrevenge/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

What's the judge going to do if the forest burns to the ground? Thinning is a good practice.


5 posted on 08/22/2006 12:10:08 PM PDT by L98Fiero (Evil is an exact science)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Like this is really Bush's plan. He stayed up all night and cooked it up.


6 posted on 08/22/2006 12:10:42 PM PDT by misterrob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Sigh.

Charles R. Breyer, Another Clintonista

7 posted on 08/22/2006 12:11:23 PM PDT by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
You're assuming that they actually care about the forest.

The only thing that motivates "enviros" is the prospect that they can prevent somebody from making a dollar.
8 posted on 08/22/2006 12:11:48 PM PDT by HEY4QDEMS (Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

If we log, we lose some trees. If we don't log, we lose all the trees.

I'm confused about the environmentalists' logic. It would seem to me that some judicious logging that prevents wild fires is a good idea. Let them pick the trees they want to save, and then cut them down in reverse order. The ones they picked first remain, the ones they picked last will go on to build mansions for Hollywood elites.


9 posted on 08/22/2006 12:12:13 PM PDT by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Let 'em burn to the ground, but don't DARE let undergrowth be cleared to manage it...someone might make MONEY (perish the thought) by managing it.


10 posted on 08/22/2006 12:13:26 PM PDT by traditional1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
U.S. District Court Judge Charles R. Breyer wants to burn down all the big trees at Sequoia.

He's deranged.

11 posted on 08/22/2006 12:15:17 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Patrick Moore was one of the original founders of Greenpeace. He had an epiphany when he realized that it was necessary to work with businesses and not be strictly confrontational. He has a saying "Save every forest, not every tree."

Here's a lengthy paper he wrote about healthy forests.

http://www.greenspirit.com/printable.cfm?msid=30


12 posted on 08/22/2006 12:16:28 PM PDT by TMD (Get Planned Parenthood out of our schools!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
How many times do the wild fires have to burn out of control before the Eviro wackos wake up to reality that THEIR "Do nothing ever" mindset IS interfering in the management of forests?

Wildfire is good for the forests. The problems come from building in a fire prone area, and expecting others to rescue you from disaster. It sorta reminds me of other greedy folk! FEMA will take care of you!


13 posted on 08/22/2006 12:19:51 PM PDT by pageonetoo (You'll spot their posts soon enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: misterrob

Heck, from the headline, it sounds like President Bush was planning to head out there with a chain saw, and start logging the place himself.

Anyhow, another day, another political decision from a Clinton-appointed federal judge.


14 posted on 08/22/2006 12:21:20 PM PDT by B Knotts (Newt '08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Could this be executive order material?


15 posted on 08/22/2006 12:32:42 PM PDT by Niteranger68 (I gigged your peace frog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Another judge has his head up where the sun don't shine. Forest management is one of the best tools we have to make the forest environmentally safer.
16 posted on 08/22/2006 12:34:38 PM PDT by Logical me (Oh, well!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Logical me

I guess it is getting to the point where everyone else in the country can kick back and do nothing. The judges will claim expertise to decide everything. We might as well close down the forest service and department of interior and let the know-it-all layers run everything.


17 posted on 08/22/2006 12:46:02 PM PDT by ClaireSolt (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Logical me

IIRC that environmental thing that was forced on this nation sure did work well for the shuttles O-Ring.


18 posted on 08/22/2006 12:47:54 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz ("If you liked what Liberal Leadership did for Israel, you'll LOVE what it can do for America!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

"How many times do the wild fires have to burn out of control before the Eviro wackos wake up to reality that THEIR "Do nothing ever" mindset IS interfering in the management of forests?"

Not until a few of the treehuggers get bbq'd in the forest fire.


19 posted on 08/22/2006 12:48:02 PM PDT by Leatherneck_MT (In a world where Carpenters come back from the dead, ALL things are possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Race or Ethnicity: White. No he is Caucasian.

Gender: Male. His sex is male but his gender can be either masculine of feminine.

Liberals seek to change the meanings of words to suit their politican aims.
I'll remain a conservative and not muddy the issues with liberal oriented word meanings such as gender. To the liberals their are, I believe, seven genders.


20 posted on 08/22/2006 12:49:05 PM PDT by em2vn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson