To: fso301
I'll bet you have a hard position on evolution vs. ID though. The evo's change that theory almost daily also. Then we get on here and go, uhh huhh, nuuh uhh, yo moma, for 3000 posts.The evo's position is always anything but God. And I mean ANYTHING.
13 posted on
08/22/2006 12:56:55 PM PDT by
chuckles
To: chuckles
I'll bet you have a hard position on evolution vs. ID though.Yes but that's because ID is only a theory.
16 posted on
08/22/2006 12:59:20 PM PDT by
fso301
To: chuckles
"The evo's change that theory almost daily also."
That's what happens when your theory has to explain every fossil found, as opposed to intelligent design which can't explain ANY fossil found.
17 posted on
08/22/2006 1:02:35 PM PDT by
Moral Hazard
(The "missing links" in evolution are nothing compared to the extraneous links in intelligent design.)
To: chuckles
The evo's change that theory almost daily also.
Uh, yes. This is the way science works. A theory is proposed based on observations, and the theory changes as new evidence is discovered. That people would point to this as a weakness of evolutionary theory is incredibly funny to me.
This paradigm makes a lot more sense to me than having a previously-written guide to the way everything must be and then trying to shoehorn all new discoveries into said guide.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson