Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

It's this kind of nonsense that makes me ask why the federal government is giving one red cent to the private sector in New Orleans. If you chose not to buy flood insurance for your home, you gambled and you lost...not my problem. If the federal gov't wants to restore its social overhead capital, that may be within the purvue of federal policy. All the rest of the problems are the compound result of inempt gov't by Nagin and perhaps the governor...their problem, not ours.
1 posted on 08/23/2006 7:45:38 AM PDT by econjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: econjack

Please send me just a half a billion. OK, I would settle for 2.37 million but no less. Any less and I would feel repressed.


2 posted on 08/23/2006 7:49:04 AM PDT by shankbear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: econjack
DEFUND THE CORRUPT.

That which is subsidized, flourishes.
STOP feeding the corrupt animal that is Louisiana politics.
STOP feeding the lazy that won't work to feed themselves.

Pouring tax dollars into New Orleans is counterproductive..
If New Orleans can ATTRACT private investment, they deserve the chance to survive.
If they can't, they don't.
Pouring money into New Orleans at this point - is pouring money into a black hole..
Excuse me --- chocolate hole.

There are far too many places along the Gulf that deserve help more than does New Orleans.

Semper Fi
5 posted on 08/23/2006 7:57:29 AM PDT by river rat (You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: econjack

Gimme, gimme more free money, whine, whine and more whine......


9 posted on 08/23/2006 8:12:29 AM PDT by Inge_CAV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: econjack

We don't want to "cut and run" in Iraq, why are we so ready to "cut and run" in NOLA? Federal government built the levees to CAT 3 levels, and a CATT 3 storm destroyed them. Now they need to fix what they broke.


10 posted on 08/23/2006 8:15:08 AM PDT by nolaw0ady (come for the funeral, stay for the pie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: econjack
Al Gore must be wrong about the ocean rising and flooding lowlands.
12 posted on 08/23/2006 8:17:43 AM PDT by mountainlyons (Hard core conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: econjack

Gonna need a bigger freezer


13 posted on 08/23/2006 8:19:05 AM PDT by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: econjack

I want some of that money.


20 posted on 08/23/2006 8:33:52 AM PDT by Tzimisce (How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President! www.dndorks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: econjack
More interesting math re: one billion:


22 posted on 08/23/2006 8:35:49 AM PDT by TChris (Banning DDT wasn't about birds. It was about power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: econjack
I've seen this nonsense posted before. It's so simplistic it's embarrassing. The 250 billion number thrown out there by Landrieu early on was not going to happen and nobody took it seriously. Even allowing that it was serious, it assumes that every cent goes to the people ONLY in New Orleans. It also assumes that nothing goes to infrastructure repair or overhead to FEMA or other agencies managing the recovery.

It makes for good bashing material for those so inclined but other than that it's pretty meaningless.
31 posted on 08/23/2006 9:34:47 AM PDT by WatchOutForSnakes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: econjack

Do you have a citation for the Landrieu aid request?


37 posted on 08/23/2006 11:11:56 AM PDT by Venator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: econjack

Mary Landrieu (D), is presently asking the Congress for $250 BILLION to rebuild New Orleans .

To even consider this is outrageous. To even consider rebuilding New Orleans is outrageous. The area has always been a catastrophy waiting to happen, it is now and it will be in the future. To throw money at that area is utterly ridiculous. For government to insure what insurance companies won't touch is outrageous. At some point someone has to hold people accountable for their decisions to live in areas that are dangerous and likely to be wiped out sooner or later.


38 posted on 08/23/2006 11:48:10 AM PDT by Joan Kerrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: econjack

I had no idea there were so many chickshit pussy people on this site. Hopefully this post is enough to get my account closed, because the people on this site are worthless do-nothings. Bye assholes!


45 posted on 08/23/2006 12:13:23 PM PDT by nolaw0ady (come for the funeral, stay for the pie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: econjack

Let's ask Hizb'allah. They seem to be throwing around a lot of rebuilding money.


46 posted on 08/23/2006 12:15:11 PM PDT by SlowBoat407 (I've had it with these &%#@* jihadis on these &%#@* planes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson