The relationship through marriage between the smuggler and two involved government agents must be investigated, and the circumstances leading to a jury convicting.
Is that jury anywhere near the standards of "peers" or did the DA run roughshod over the PD's preferences?
Was the judge somehow biased (political appointee or party hack)?
Did that judge allow suppression of information or evidence that would have led to a fair hearing - possibly even abusing their powers to insure the Prosecutor had an overwhelming advantage (like a jury made up of people possessing the barest grasp of English and a will to "stick it" to the Border Patrol)?
Congressman Jones' contact web address is:
http://jones.house.gov/html/contact.cfm