Skip to comments.
Study: Polar Bear Genitals are Shrinking (Bush's Fault)
Live Science ^
| Aug 23, 2006
| Charles Q. Choi
Posted on 08/24/2006 6:57:50 AM PDT by presidio9
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-88 next last
To: presidio9
Sonne and his colleagues looked at formaldehyde-preserved genitals from 55 male and 44 female east Greenland polar bears, collected from 1999 to 2002 by about 30 polar bear subsistence hunters regulated by the Greenland government.Who were the lucky ones to get this job?
21
posted on
08/24/2006 7:01:58 AM PDT
by
RockinRight
(She rocks my world, and I rock her world.)
To: cripplecreek
Shrinkage!!!!
22
posted on
08/24/2006 7:02:13 AM PDT
by
Rummyfan
To: All
My friend George wants to know: Did they take the measurements before or after the bears came out of the water?
23
posted on
08/24/2006 7:02:17 AM PDT
by
Sacajaweau
(God Bless Our Troops!!)
To: presidio9
"I was in the POOL! There was shrinkage!!!!
24
posted on
08/24/2006 7:02:19 AM PDT
by
Minnesocold
("The public demand to protect our borders will triumph sooner or later." - Tony Blankley)
To: Rummyfan
Polar bears must not be excited by liberals with rulers...
To: presidio9
Are these French polar bears?
To: presidio9
Mine too.
To: presidio9
Millions of dollars to measure polar bear nuts.
one word
SHRINKAGE!
28
posted on
08/24/2006 7:03:41 AM PDT
by
finnman69
(cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
To: Puppage
Study: Polar Bear Genitals are ShrinkingPOLAR BEARS = DEMOCRATS
Yep, because if they were Republican Senators they would have no balls at all.
29
posted on
08/24/2006 7:03:42 AM PDT
by
commish
(Freedom tastes sweetest to those who have fought to protect it.)
To: presidio9
Polar bear genitalia is shrinking? Don't worry, nobody looks at those.
To: presidio9
I thought size didn't matter. Darn it, i KNEW that was a lie!!!!!
;D
31
posted on
08/24/2006 7:04:46 AM PDT
by
Shimmer128
(I see dumb people. They're everywhere. They don't even know they're dumb.)
To: finnman69
To: presidio9
Kinda "flys in the face" of global warming.
33
posted on
08/24/2006 7:05:43 AM PDT
by
kjam22
To: presidio9
To: presidio9
Some people have too much time on their hands.
35
posted on
08/24/2006 7:08:15 AM PDT
by
DOGEY
To: presidio9
spoiling their love lives and causing their numbers to peter out. Then they just need to get a new Peterbilt (groan).
36
posted on
08/24/2006 7:09:51 AM PDT
by
1066AD
To: RockinRight
That was my first thought. But I was late to the thread... You're falling down on your pinging duties!
37
posted on
08/24/2006 7:10:07 AM PDT
by
Tatze
(This tagline is brought to you by the Admin Moderator!)
To: cyborg
38
posted on
08/24/2006 7:11:28 AM PDT
by
Petronski
(Living His life abundantly.)
To: Puppage
Well, you did see that there is a 41% reproduction gap between Democrats and Republicans. Republicans are producing 41% more children that Democrats. Democrats have the abortion and gay issues working against them.
If we can't yet vote them out, we'll breed them out.
39
posted on
08/24/2006 7:12:02 AM PDT
by
Tatze
(This tagline is brought to you by the Admin Moderator!)
To: presidio9
40
posted on
08/24/2006 7:12:02 AM PDT
by
Darnright
(http://www.irey.com/)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-88 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson