Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New law gives too many people a license to kill
Miami Herald ^ | August 24, 2006 | Fred Grimm

Posted on 8/24/2006, 9:21:29 PM by KstoDC

The legal defense of Red Rock and Yellow Man, a couple of feuding Liberty City street thugs up on murder charges, has been bolstered by 62 members of the Florida House of Representatives and 28 state senators.

Police say a stray bullet from a July 1 shootout between Damon ''Red Rock'' Darling and Leroy ''Yellow Man'' LaRose, both with long rap sheets, killed 9-year-old Sherdavia Jenkins. But police and prosecutors worry that the ''Stand Your Ground'' law passed in 2005 with 90 sponsors and overwhelming support in both houses of the Florida Legislature, has complicated their case against the two men.

The law, pushed through the Legislature in Florida (and 14 other states) by the National Rifle Association, has broadened the legal definition of self-defense, no longer requiring the use of deadly force only as a last resort. A person, feeling threatened, ``has no duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground and meet force with force, including deadly force.''

This kind of macho legislation gets political testosterone churning. Supporters envisioned a beleaguered suburban soccer dad fending off a tattooed ex-con with a righteous hail of bullets. The law prohibits police from detaining or arresting a suspect in a self-defense case without clear evidence of malice. Red Rock and Yellow Man are grateful.

"Unfortunately, you can't write a law that says only good citizens can use deadly force to protect themselves,'' said Jay Plotkin, chief assistant state attorney in the Fourth Judicial District, which includes Jacksonville, another Florida city beset with a murder epidemic. ``If a bad guy is defending himself against another bad guy, the law applies to him, too.''

(Excerpt) Read more at miami.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: crime; florida; guns
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

1 posted on 8/24/2006, 9:21:30 PM by KstoDC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: KstoDC

I'm just making an assumption here but I'm guessing that neither Yello or Red are legal gun owners.


2 posted on 8/24/2006, 9:24:48 PM by cripplecreek (If stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KstoDC

A bit disturbing in it's ramifications.


3 posted on 8/24/2006, 9:25:02 PM by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KstoDC
There's a whole mess of people who need killin'
4 posted on 8/24/2006, 9:25:28 PM by msnimje (What part of-- "DEATH TO AMERICA" --do the Democrats not understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KstoDC

Fred Grimm and his editor ought to be horse whipped for this article making it to publication.

It is and always will be illegal for a felon to own or possess a firearm in the great state of Florida.



5 posted on 8/24/2006, 9:26:30 PM by Fighting Irish (Béagán agus a rá go maith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KstoDC

Talk about reaching for a straw man.


6 posted on 8/24/2006, 9:27:13 PM by Egon (We are number one! All others are number two... or lower.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KstoDC

I'm sure if a Miami resident is threatened by thugs, the Miami Herald will send someone over to defend them with pious platitudes and warm feelings.


7 posted on 8/24/2006, 9:29:03 PM by keithtoo (Israeli defense strategy "Cogito Ergo Boom!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KstoDC
...both with long rap sheets

So how did they legally own guns? I am guessing they didn't. If so, the debate stops right there for me

8 posted on 8/24/2006, 9:29:15 PM by Gator101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KstoDC
Police say a stray bullet

The issue is not as presented. Whoever fired the fatal bullet is responsible and the intent of causing injury was present. No accident.

9 posted on 8/24/2006, 9:30:32 PM by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Egon
"Talk about reaching for a straw man."


Yep! Lets not talk about why these third world savages (with admittedly long rap sheets) were running loose in the first place instead of picking up trash along a Florida highway.
10 posted on 8/24/2006, 9:30:32 PM by samm1148
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: KstoDC
In June, unarmed Jason Rosenbloom was shot during an argument in Clearwater with his next-door neighbor. He was shot just outside the neighbor's front door. The neighbor said he was afraid.

The devil, as always, is in the details. Was this a friendly disagreement, like whether the Dolphins were going to suck this year, or a violent outburst, like "come out here so I can kick your ass"? Considering the outcome, I would suspect the latter, in which case it's a justified shooting (and a good law).

11 posted on 8/24/2006, 9:31:22 PM by randog (What the...?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KstoDC
Subtle defense.

Of course, self-defense doesn't usually involve arbitrarily killing other people, but this is made to order for the anti-gun crowd.

Of course, the criminal lawyers who are abusing the law this way are themselves to blame for the mis-use.
12 posted on 8/24/2006, 9:32:28 PM by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fighting Irish

The article does not state whether or not the guns where legal, but it is probably a safe bet they weren't.

Even if he is charged for possession of an illegal firearm, what about the murder charge? The law does not seem to make an exception.


13 posted on 8/24/2006, 9:32:33 PM by KstoDC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: KstoDC
"Unfortunately, you can't write a law that says only good citizens can use deadly force to protect themselves,''

Ahhh, but you can write a law that says only good citizens can legally own guns. I believe we already have quite a few.

These punks gave up the right to use guns, even in defense, when they turned to a life of crime.

14 posted on 8/24/2006, 9:33:49 PM by Gator101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KstoDC

The MSM in Fla has gone berserk since the passing of this law, making it sound like the streets are awash in blood.
They aren't; violent crime is actually down.
The so called "Stand Your Ground" law hasn't affected the laws regarding 'concealed carry' one bit.


15 posted on 8/24/2006, 9:33:51 PM by E8Ret
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
I'm just making an assumption here but I'm guessing that neither Yello or Red are legal gun owners.

Exactly.

The people who wrote this article haven't studied the issue.

16 posted on 8/24/2006, 9:34:07 PM by grundle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: randog

"In June, unarmed Jason Rosenbloom was shot during an argument in Clearwater with his next-door neighbor."

"Well, he should have armed himself." - William "Bill" Munny


17 posted on 8/24/2006, 9:35:07 PM by L98Fiero (Evil is an exact science)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: KstoDC

Fry him.


18 posted on 8/24/2006, 9:35:15 PM by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KstoDC
What's your opinion on this?

As you are a brand new user, I'm curious about your choice for a first post.

19 posted on 8/24/2006, 9:35:24 PM by TChris (Banning DDT wasn't about birds. It was about power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KstoDC

Not the same guy. Just thought the nick of one of the thugs rang a bell.

20 posted on 8/24/2006, 9:35:30 PM by Tench_Coxe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson