To: blam
I realize Musharref is more-or-less a dictator, but maybe that's the best option in Islamic societies. Democracy, in and of itself, isn't a cure-all solution, as evidenced by the election of Hamas in the PA and the unwillingness of the elected Leb govt. to contain the Hezzies. Churchill once suggested that WWII might have been averted had a strong constitutional monarchy been established in Germany after WWI. Something of that nature might serve better in the ME, IMHO.
9 posted on
08/24/2006 7:41:34 PM PDT by
lesser_satan
(EKTHELTHIOR!!!)
To: lesser_satan
Not as a complete comparison but how many people today would consider the American republic established in 1789 a 'democracy.' We had slavery and women could not vote. Ending both (mainly slavery) caused enormous bloodshed. Big changes do not occur non-violently. They are fought over. At some point even Islam will be compelled to make changes to survive in the real world, but it will be bloody and vicious.
12 posted on
08/24/2006 8:17:02 PM PDT by
DHerion
To: lesser_satan
Good point. Whatever his shortcomings, who the hell would want the insane mullahs to replace him?
20 posted on
08/24/2006 9:12:24 PM PDT by
Larry Lucido
("There's no problem so big that government intervention can't make it worse.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson