Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Katherine Harris says failure to elect Christians will `legislate sin'
KRT Wire ^ | 8/25/2006 | Jim Stratton

Posted on 08/25/2006 7:47:48 PM PDT by Alex Murphy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 521-533 next last
To: JSDude1
>> She was probably just thinking or phrazed her comment this way because she IS a CHRISTIAN-Bible Believing, K. Harris doesn't hate anyone, and she probably left of Jewish-Torah Believing as an abscence of mind, not anything anti-Jewish!! <<

Well if she just "wasn't thinking straight" and would like to retract or clarify her comments and explain she supports the election of moral, ethical Reaganites who are "non-Christians", then I will welcome her comments.

I personally know a "non-Christian" Republican (he is of the Sikh faith) who ran in the GOP primary against Barack Obama. Sikhs are an Indian-based faith that is very devout, pro-life, conservative ethic that believes in a monothetist idea of one true God like Christians and Jews.

I would have welcomed the election of a "non-Christian" like him over the alledgedly "Christian" Barack Obama.

The problem is your gal Kathy didn't say we need to elect more "Reaganites" or "moral people" or even more "religious" people to office, she said we have to elect Christians and if we DON'T elect "Christians" then we're legislating sin. The reason why we don't' support your gal Kathy is she's bound to lose to Nelson in a landslide if she keeps "phrasing" her comments that way.

61 posted on 08/25/2006 9:31:19 PM PDT by BillyBoy (ILLINOIS ELECTION "CHOICES:" Rod Bag-o-$hit or Judas Barf Too-Pinka)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: SmoothTalker
I think a chimp is running her campaign.

I think her campaign is running a chimp.

62 posted on 08/25/2006 9:31:19 PM PDT by Wormwood (Iä! Iä! Cthulhu fhtagn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv; fieldmarshaldj; Clintonfatigued

More Harris observations about the doings in the public square.


63 posted on 08/25/2006 9:31:31 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

That's okay, perhaps I was a bit touchy! :-)


64 posted on 08/25/2006 9:31:33 PM PDT by ladyinred (Leftists, the enemy within.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: highball
That is also what I meant in my statement "that considering she had already served government".

I did limit it to her run for this thread, but I agree that if true the statement shows great vapidity on Katherine's part. I still am not sure this is true.
65 posted on 08/25/2006 9:32:13 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
What a dim bulb. Why couldn't she kept her mouth shut and maybe kept her seat in the house? But no, she bites off more than she could chew. I hope she loses. Better a democrat than a nutcase.
66 posted on 08/25/2006 9:32:46 PM PDT by Octar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred

I'm a bit tired as I am posting tonight, so I am sure my posts are not as clear as they could be either.


67 posted on 08/25/2006 9:36:06 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Lawyer ping.

And if we are the ones not actively involved in electing those godly men and women," then "we're going to have a nation of secular laws. That's not what our founding fathers intended and that's (sic) certainly isn't what God intended."

68 posted on 08/25/2006 9:36:31 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

Speaking as a non-religious conservative, bite me Katherine Harris. Have fun losing by 40 points in November.


69 posted on 08/25/2006 9:37:01 PM PDT by DallasJ7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

Harris just doesn't handle this issue as well as I do, does she? :) LOL.


70 posted on 08/25/2006 9:37:24 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
I still am not sure this is true.

GIven how profoundly stupid and dishonest her campaign has been, I tend to believe that this is true, and I'm not sure I'd believe it if they tried to deny the statement.

Time to get her out of the race. There's still time to salvage this. Florida is too red to fall because we couldn't be bothered to field a candidate qualified for office.

71 posted on 08/25/2006 9:38:48 PM PDT by highball (Proud to announce the birth of little Highball, Junior - Feb. 7, 2006!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: highball
If you think her comments about having a religious test for office are bad, you ought to see her supporters accusing GOP leaders of treason for not "supporting" her in the primary. It's bad enough we we have GOP leaders supporting crooked incumbents seeking re-election in GOP primaries, if they start pushing for certain candidates in open races we might as well just abolish the primary system and let a bunch of GOP elitists pick the nominee for us behind closed doors.

I guess the Harris supporters wouldn't mind that, as long as Jeb Bush would "Get behind" Harris so she'd get to face Nelson without having to struggle against a bunch of "unknowns" in the primary. If she's such a great Republican official and all her primary opponents are "last minute jokes who filed", you have to wonder why the Harris crowd is so hellbent on demanding the party play favorites.

72 posted on 08/25/2006 9:39:43 PM PDT by BillyBoy (ILLINOIS ELECTION "CHOICES:" Rod Bag-o-$hit or Judas Barf Too-Pinka)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy

True, but Kathy I'm sure would support the Sikh over non-Christian-Christian Barak Obama too, It's just that she mean the election of more Bible-Believing true Christians would make this country great(er). I am sure that you would not question that either.. I am sure that you would support the election of Christian-Reaganites like Pat Toomey over supposed Christians like Spector also.. would you not..?


73 posted on 08/25/2006 9:42:23 PM PDT by JSDude1 (www.pence08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: livius
I'm evangelical and I like Catholics. I'm expecting to meet Mother Teresa and Mel Gibson in the hereafter, among many others. It's whats in your heart, not the name of your particular denomination.
74 posted on 08/25/2006 9:43:18 PM PDT by July4th64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Harris said Christians should be elected. She never mentioned Jews.

Among others, including those not blessed with a leap of faith, of which I am one. I don't think Harris thinks things through very well, or frankly has much knowledge about any of this. In short, yes, I will say it, she is an "air brain." I don't think she means much harm really. She just pounds the keyboard as it were, but via her mouth.

75 posted on 08/25/2006 9:44:45 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1
If your last statement is 100% true, then sadly, Harris is NO Christian!

Pssssssssssssssssssssssssst.....she didn't say that the person had to be a GOOD Christian; just a "Christian".

76 posted on 08/25/2006 9:45:13 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1

I am sure that Harris in that event, didn't say what she "meant."


77 posted on 08/25/2006 9:45:53 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: livius

[I agree, because I'm Catholic and evangelicals do not like us.]

I'm evangelical and I like Catholics. I'm expecting to meet Mother Teresa and Mel Gibson in the hereafter, among many others. It's whats in your heart, not the name of your particular denomination.

Strangely, I ended up with italics and lost the first sentence in my post on last attempt to post this...how odd!


78 posted on 08/25/2006 9:46:08 PM PDT by July4th64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1
I am sure that you would support the election of Christian-Reaganites like Pat Toomey over supposed Christians like Spector also.. would you not..?

Toomey should have won that primary, but Specter isn't a Christian, supposed or no. He's Jewish.

79 posted on 08/25/2006 9:46:39 PM PDT by darkangel82 (Higher visibility leads to greater zottability.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Borders.Language.Beer.

It certainly can't be because she's nuts, that'd be too simple.

Must be a conspiracy. Yeah.


80 posted on 08/25/2006 9:46:52 PM PDT by stands2reason (ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 521-533 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson