Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran puts nuclear plant into operation
rte / cnn ^ | 26 August 2006 10:01

Posted on 08/26/2006 3:04:56 AM PDT by maquiladora

Iran has announced that a heavy water reactor plant south-west of Tehran has been put into operation.

The plutonium by-product of the plant could be used to make atomic war-heads but Iran insists it only intends to build nuclear power plants.

The move comes days before a UN deadline for Iran to halt uranium enrichment, the part of Tehran's atomic programme that most worries the West.

......................

A Reuters witness said on Saturday the president inaugurated the project and toured the site at Khondab, which is near Arak, 190 kilometers (120 miles) southwest of the capital Tehran. The plant's plutonium by-product could be used to make atomic warheads.

A small group of correspondents from foreign news organizations were taken with Iranian journalists to Khondab, the site near Arak where the heavy-water project is being built, to attend the presidential speech.

The complex was protected by dozens of anti-aircraft guns and surrounded by a four-meter high barbed wire fence. Photographers and TV journalists were asked not to take any images except in areas where they were specifically permitted.

(Excerpt) Read more at rte.ie ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: arak; bombirannow; iran; irannukes; khondab; plutonium
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: maquiladora

we should have dropped an ICBM on this plant while old Achmed
was there.


41 posted on 08/26/2006 1:07:34 PM PDT by LeoWindhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora
If they're able to develop this technology for civilian use, none have a moral right to prevent them from using it. It's what they may do with byproducts that concerns.

If they go to nuclear power for electrical generation I say, "Bravo!," and wish we'd have the guts to build new plants ourselves.

42 posted on 08/26/2006 4:12:08 PM PDT by newzjunkey (Support Arnold-McClintock or embrace high taxes, gay weddings with Angelides.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madconserv
Well, those aren't mutually exclusive statements. Just because he said the 'Zionist regime' should be removed from the map, doesn't mean Iran is able or willing to do it themselves.

If everything south of Turkey, north of Egypt and west of Nepal fell into a hole tomorrow, the world could be a lot quieter.

43 posted on 08/26/2006 4:15:22 PM PDT by newzjunkey (Support Arnold-McClintock or embrace high taxes, gay weddings with Angelides.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jedi Master Pikachu

Hvy water reactors use plain unenriched unranium, making energy production simple then the spent fuel rods contain plutonium to make plutonium bombs with (nagasaki)


44 posted on 08/26/2006 5:57:22 PM PDT by omega4179 (Visualize separate Airlines for Muslims.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #45 Removed by Moderator

To: smokerwoman
Where the Israelis live now was the Land of the Jews long before there were any Arabs or any islam . They merely came home and live now in their own ancestral lands.
On the other hand the majority of 'arabs' were traditionally a nomadic people . One would think that in all the years since 48' some so-called arab nations would have been more accommodating to those arab that did not want to live with the Jews. Why does Egypt not offer the Palestinians the Sinai for instance?
Arabs behave as tribals and they reap their karma for that .
The Jews are better for the land of Israel that any arabs could ever hope to be. Plus their claims hold far greater weight and vintage.
46 posted on 08/26/2006 8:24:15 PM PDT by LeoWindhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora

What are we waiting for?


47 posted on 08/26/2006 10:39:35 PM PDT by rdl6989
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora

How long does a heavy water plant have to run before it produces enough Plutonium to make a bomb? Because if the announcment is that the plant came on line today, I have a bad feeling that it actually came on line some time ago and these freaks already have several.


48 posted on 08/27/2006 8:05:41 AM PDT by Old_Mil (http://www.constitutionparty.org - Forging a Rebirth of Freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora

Its not operational yet...

"Iran has been building the heavy-water reactor for two years, and it is not scheduled for completion until 2009."

http://regimechangeiran.blogspot.com/2006/08/iranian-president-inaugurates-reactor.html


49 posted on 08/27/2006 9:15:08 AM PDT by DoctorZIn (Until they are Free, "We shall all be Iranians!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog

Good post. Are there still many breeder reactors in the world?


50 posted on 08/27/2006 5:23:55 PM PDT by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
...I swear it's like pre-World War II with Hitler...


51 posted on 08/27/2006 5:29:41 PM PDT by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Eagle74
Excellent post.

I would add that rather than simply destroying those facilities, we should occupy the terminals and nearby fields.

That would introduce a new aspect to the control of that flow. - And we could do it, despite what the MSM pundits would have us believe.
52 posted on 08/27/2006 5:35:55 PM PDT by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora

I wish we could have some nuke power plants in Alaska. Greeley had one for a while. Galena was going to get one. Fairbanks should have one if only because the coal plants put out so much fog in the winter.


53 posted on 08/27/2006 5:38:08 PM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

I agree that the navy should take the oil platforms in the gulf, but port facilities used for the export/import of oil, should be smashed.
The major objection I have been getting about this Idea is that gas prices will go up to much. But I like the Idea of prices going up as it is my firm belief that the only reason we as a nation are not energy independent is political. And consumers screaming about fuel prices will put pressure on the politicians to do something. I would be willing to pay extra gas taxes if that money was used to force rapid development of US energy self sufficiency. Oil shale, alcohol, nuclear power we can be energy independent. In fact we could be exporters.


54 posted on 08/27/2006 6:40:48 PM PDT by Eagle74 (From time to time the tree of liberty must be watered with the blood of tyrants and patriots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora

"Iran has announced that a heavy water reactor plant south-west of Tehran has been put into operation."

Well, we have a legit target now. Take it out!


55 posted on 08/28/2006 3:41:47 PM PDT by boughtwithaprice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora
"Iran puts nuclear 'weapons' plant into operation."
56 posted on 08/28/2006 8:38:32 PM PDT by M. Espinola (Freedom is not free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson