To: txzman
and Rome was just as bloodthirsty for conquest as the Islamofascists.The difference being, of course, that the Romans also had things like representative goverment, private property, legal status for citizens, etc.
7 posted on
08/27/2006 6:05:02 PM PDT by
KayEyeDoubleDee
(const Tag &referenceToConstTag)
To: KayEyeDoubleDee
The difference being, of course, that the Romans also had things like representative goverment, private property, legal status for citizens, etc.
_______________________________________________________
And Plumbing. It was a real mess before we got that!
8 posted on
08/27/2006 6:31:41 PM PDT by
Grizzled Bear
("Does not play well with others.")
To: KayEyeDoubleDee
Romans also had things like representative goverment, private property, legal status for citizens, etc. They also had such wonders as chattel slavery, mass murder as a form of public entertainment, and the 'representative government' you speak of was more akin to the Politburo under Stalin.
The Emperor could legally have just about anyone in the Empire murdered just for kicks.
Granted they had art and architecture but there really wasn't all that much to admire about Roman society.
L
13 posted on
08/27/2006 7:57:20 PM PDT by
Lurker
(If you want peace, prepare for war.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson