Well, that's really an unfair comparison.
The "master of light" seems to have totally neglected the parallel world of shadows.
He seems to have gotten to a point, technically, and then stopped learning.
"Well, that's really an unfair comparison."
I guess it is. That's why I have Parrish prints in my home, and not any of that Kinkade stuff. It's too cheesey for my taste. Not that I'm an expert or anything....
I think the master of light got cash in his pocket for his style of paintings. And then churned them out without varying from his routine. I rented a room from one such painter in the early '70's. He spent his time painting the same painting over and over with small variations. People were paying thousands for his work. I forget his name. He was a nice enough sleezebag.