Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ex-Colleague Says Armitage Was Source of CIA Leak(Buried on Page A6 Wa ComPost)
WASHINGTONPOST.COM ^ | August 29, 2006 | R. Jeffrey Smith

Posted on 08/29/2006 7:27:38 PM PDT by kellynla

The leak of information about an undercover CIA employee that provoked a special prosecutor's investigation of senior White House officials came from then-Deputy Secretary of State Richard L. Armitage, according to a former Armitage colleague at the department.

Armitage told newspaper columnist Robert D. Novak in the summer of 2003 that Valerie Plame, the wife of a prominent critic of the Iraq war, worked for the CIA, the colleague said. In October of that year, Armitage admitted to senior State Department officials that he had made the remark, which was based on a classified report he had read.

Novak collected what he considered to be a confirming comment from White House political strategist Karl Rove, then wrote a column in July 2003 that cited Plame's CIA employment as a reason to question the credentials of the critic, former U.S. ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV.

In 2002, the CIA sent Wilson to Niger to determine whether Iraq was seeking nuclear material there. He subsequently accused the White House of distorting intelligence to justify the invasion of Iraq.

Novak's column set off a chain of events that culminated in the appointment of special prosecutor Patrick J. Fitzgerald and a grand jury's indictment of Vice President Cheney's chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, for lying to investigators about his own conversations with reporters regarding Plame.

(Excerpt) Read more at freerepublic.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: armitage; cialeak; plame
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last
"The leak of information about an undercover CIA employee?"

The first sentence in this piece is inaccurate. Plame was a CIA desk jockey at the time. Nothing more. And the article just gets worse from there.
1 posted on 08/29/2006 7:27:39 PM PDT by kellynla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Powell sure comes off looking bad as a result of this.


2 posted on 08/29/2006 7:29:32 PM PDT by Paladin2 (If the political indictment's from Fitz, the jury always acquits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

MLH - Modified Limited Hangout.


3 posted on 08/29/2006 7:30:00 PM PDT by dirtboy (This tagline has been photoshopped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jan in Colorado

ping


4 posted on 08/29/2006 7:31:00 PM PDT by Gondring (If "Conservatives" now want to "conserve" our Constitution away, then I must be a Preservative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

why? no one did anything wrong here, she was not covert, and she had inserted herself into the Niger story by recommending her husband for the trip.

don't forget - Libby is not charged with outing her.


5 posted on 08/29/2006 7:32:28 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
"Powell sure comes off looking bad as a result of this."

Powell, Armitage & Fitzgerald!

Fitzgerald spent three years and hundreds of thousands of taxpayers' dollars "investigating" what any beat cop in America could have determined in a day. Valerie Plame was NOT a covert CIA agent.
Fitzgerald owes Americans three years back salary & expenses for this SHAM "investigation!"
6 posted on 08/29/2006 7:35:21 PM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
Powell has looked BAD long before this. The bloom was off that rose, many years ago.
7 posted on 08/29/2006 7:35:26 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

The buffoons in the Senate need to be demanding "a probe" into what actually went on with this Plame fiasco and have the 'RATS explain why so many taxpayer dollars were thrown into this sewer.


8 posted on 08/29/2006 7:38:09 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Ernesto has been downgraded to Ernie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
"no one did anything wrong here?"

tell us you're joking!

Powell(Larry)
Armitage(Moe)
Fitzgerald(Curley)

try selling your opinion to Scooter Libby's wife(their bank account is probably short a couple hundred thousand dollars for lawyers' fees)....for starters!!!
9 posted on 08/29/2006 7:41:27 PM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Your link seems to go to Hitchen's Slate article....not the WP


10 posted on 08/29/2006 7:41:47 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Your links are messed up. They just go to another Free Republic thread.


11 posted on 08/29/2006 7:43:43 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

obviously, I am not talking about Fitzgerald.

Libby fell into a perjury trap set by Fitzgerald - Powell and Armitage did not set that perjury trap, and they did not violate the intelligence acts, since Plame was not covert.


12 posted on 08/29/2006 7:44:59 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: All

Oooops!
Here's the correct link.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/28/AR2006082801278_pf.html


13 posted on 08/29/2006 7:47:37 PM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard; oceanview

Post 13


14 posted on 08/29/2006 7:48:39 PM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

there are no charges that could be brought against Armitage, which is why Fitzgerald didn't do anything to him.

look, the grounds for immediate dismissal of Fitzgerald are clearly in place now. That likely will not happen, the administration has never been able to do anything but play defense on this story, so I don't expect Fitzgerald to be fired - the sheeple are so ignorant about the facts in this case, the MSM would just spin his firing into a "saturday night massacre" watergate issue, and the sheeple would believe it.


15 posted on 08/29/2006 7:55:22 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

I have neither the time or the inclination to point out the indiscretions of Powell & Armitage.
But since you have the link to Christopher Hitchens article on this entire mess...try reading it and then maybe you will see what Powell & Armitage did wrong!


16 posted on 08/29/2006 7:57:30 PM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

Someone, anyone, needs to OUT Joe Wilson for his role in Niger,,,his company has ties to terrorist sympathizer ALAMOUDI!!!!


17 posted on 08/29/2006 8:02:30 PM PDT by Suzy Quzy ("When Cabals Go Kabooms"....upcoming book on Mary McCarthy's Coup-Plotters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

Powell/Armitage are co-cabalists...coup-plotters.


18 posted on 08/29/2006 8:04:00 PM PDT by Suzy Quzy ("When Cabals Go Kabooms"....upcoming book on Mary McCarthy's Coup-Plotters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

where is that link?

Libby is charged with perjury - with telling the FBI X when other facts show he knew X at a different time. now, we can argue about the facts as they pertain to this "perjury". But what are you saying, that Armitage and Powell should have gone public before the GJ convened?


19 posted on 08/29/2006 8:04:23 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Suzy Quzy

how? this information Armitage "leaked", wasn't a leak at all - it was a legitimate piece of information in the rebuttal argument against Wilson.

what are you saying, that Powell and Armitage set the whole thing up by "leaking" this non-leak? that this communication to Novak was a planned setup to have a special prosecutor, and a GJ, and a perjury trap for Libby? that is a stretch.


20 posted on 08/29/2006 8:08:14 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson