[loboinok]

"But in any event, the only distinction that our Constitution makes between the rights of native-born and naturalized citizens is that the latter may not serve as President of the United States."

Then you would agree that a terrorist whos sole intent is to secure constitutional protections, perjures themselves by swearing a (false)oath of allegience, is a legal citizen?

[George Maschke]

Then you would agree that a terrorist whos sole intent is to secure constitutional protections, perjures themselves by swearing a (false)oath of allegience, is a legal citizen?

Of course. But there is a legal process for addressing such situations, and those who commit fraud in seeking U.S. citzenship may be legally stripped of it.

But the U.S. Government's conduct in this case appears to be outside the law. No U.S. citizen -- naturalized or native-born -- should be stripped of his right to enter our country simply because some government official suspects he has broken a law.