To: nyconse
If Pres. Bush allows Iran to get a nuke because of politics then he is no better than Clinton and will truly be a failed President.
There is actually more reason for taking Iran out then there was Saddam
Problem is I don't know if we have the military capability other than massive bombing
Iran needs a regine chance for long term solution but our military manpower is so thinned out I doubt we can affect an occupation
If his father had gone all the way in Iraq ( UN Resolutions be damned ) it would be a compleletly different picture in the ME today . We still had a large military then and Iran was 15 years away from the nuclear threat they have become .With our forces in Iraq a change in Iran could have been forced
So both Bushes can be blamed
Forget Clinton --expecting anything from the democrats is senseless
20 posted on
08/30/2006 6:51:00 AM PDT by
uncbob
To: uncbob
I agree completely. I do not believe even today with the Twin Towers gone that our government-across the board- understands the danger in Iran, Lebanon, Syria etc. I truly think they believe these suicide bombers can be contained. Korea is bad enough having a bomb-a jihadist with a nuclear bomb is a death sentence for Israel and ulimately millions of Americans.
25 posted on
08/30/2006 7:12:18 AM PDT by
nyconse
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson