Your "no results" left out Armitage in your post, i.e.:
Armitage - no results
Funny how they are no longer interested in the story... just when it was getting good! LOL!
Found 0 results, displaying . Search time , run time .
MIA !!!
Funny how they are no longer interested in the story... just when it was getting good! LOL!
___________________________________________________________
The NYTimes isn't interested for good reason:
Plame-Gate Bombs Out, But the Times Barely Notices
"Not with a bang..." So much for the Valerie Plame controversy.
Posted by: Clay Waters
http://www.timeswatch.org/articles/2006/20060830133451.aspx
It really wasn't so long ago that the Times found it of vital importance exactly who told columnist Robert Novak that anti-war ambassador Joseph Wilson's wife worked for the CIA.
Now we know, thanks to "Hubris," a new book by Newsweek reporter Michael Isikoff and left-wing writer David Corn of The Nation, someone who bears much responsibility for puffing up the Plame non-story in the first place.
Times legal reporter Neil Lewis notes what everyone who has Internet access already knows -- that Richard Armitage, former deputy secretary of state under Colin Powell, was columnist Robert Novak's source for the information that Joe Wilson's wife, Valerie Wilson/Plame, worked for the CIA.
Having lost the partisan angle of a vengeful White House out to sabotage the now-discredited Wilson for suggesting the Iraq War was based on false pretenses (the moderate Armitage was no fan of the war), the Times shrugs the story off onto page A12: "First Source of C.I.A. Leak Admits Role, Lawyers Says."