Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: goldstategop

Exactly. And there's no evidence that it's an abortifacient, either. So, about 95% of the uses are unnecessary.
http://www.cmda.org/index.cgi?BISKIT=216935661&CONTEXT=art&art=2360#art1


9 posted on 09/02/2006 7:11:12 AM PDT by hocndoc (http://www.lifeethics.org/www.lifeethics.org/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: hocndoc

This...

"The reason I am still wary is the evidence that the "luteal" phase of the cycle - the time from ovulation to the time the woman starts shedding her uterine lining - is shortened in some women. If the lining is shed early, I can't be sure that there could not be a loss of an embryo which is beginning to implant."

...admits the possibility that it could be an abortifascient.


10 posted on 09/02/2006 10:13:32 AM PDT by dsc (o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson