Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Questions About Inquiry in C.I.A. Leak
NY Slimes ^ | 09/02/06 | DAVID JOHNSTON

Posted on 09/02/2006 9:49:19 AM PDT by JerseyDvl

WASHINGTON, Sept. 1 — An enduring mystery of the C.I.A. leak case has been solved in recent days, but with a new twist: Patrick J. Fitzgerald, the prosecutor, knew the identity of the leaker from his very first day in the special counsel’s chair, but kept the inquiry open for nearly two more years before indicting I. Lewis Libby Jr., Vice President Dick Cheney’s former chief of staff, on obstruction charges. Now, the question of whether Mr. Fitzgerald properly exercised his prosecutorial discretion in continuing to pursue possible wrongdoing in the case has become the subject of rich debate on editorial pages and in legal and political circles.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cialeak; patrickfitzgerald; plamegate; scooterlibby
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
Even the NY Slimes is piling on Fitz! This is pure Schadenfreude.
1 posted on 09/02/2006 9:49:23 AM PDT by JerseyDvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JerseyDvl
I my humble opinion I think Fitz should be prosecuted for spending our tax dollars, on something he already knew the answer to. If he knew who and when, he mis-appropeated tax dollars to fund his own agenda.
2 posted on 09/02/2006 9:56:06 AM PDT by SFGI (Liberator of the Oppressed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JerseyDvl

This whole fiasco makes me sick at my stomach!

Who can, or will, defang Fitz? Does anyone, short of the President, have the authority to say "Sit down, boy. You've done enough damage for one lifetime"?


3 posted on 09/02/2006 9:58:15 AM PDT by Ole Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SFGI

Agreed, and let's not forget the pain and suffering inflicted on members of the Bush Administration for the last three years.


4 posted on 09/02/2006 10:00:01 AM PDT by LiteKeeper (Beware the secularization of America; the Islamization of Eurabia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SFGI
I my humble opinion I think Fitz should be prosecuted for spending our tax dollars

Unfortunately the LAST thing politicians will worry about (if they worry about it at all) is how much money this (or pretty much anything else they do) cost us, the taxpayers.

Almost all politicians believe they have access to an unending supply of the peeples money, and these politicians intend to spend as much as possible.

Worry about taxpayer money?? Don't hold your breath.

5 posted on 09/02/2006 10:02:10 AM PDT by technomage (NEVER underestimate the depths to which liberals will stoop for power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JerseyDvl

Once again the drive-by-media winds up with mud on their collective faces. Will they ever learn? I doubt it.


6 posted on 09/02/2006 10:09:23 AM PDT by mom-7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JerseyDvl

It feels like the media is trying to get out in front of this story. I wonder if there is another level we have not heard of yet.


7 posted on 09/02/2006 10:15:16 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JerseyDvl

Fitz should have to answer for his actions!


8 posted on 09/02/2006 10:22:20 AM PDT by RAY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JerseyDvl

Search, it's a function; try it:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1694210/posts


9 posted on 09/02/2006 10:23:35 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JerseyDvl

So now the drive-by is going to shuck Fitz under the bus.

ROTFLOL! That's what Fitz gets for aligning with them. Now that's he no longer useful to them .. he's getting thrown over. Typical!


10 posted on 09/02/2006 10:23:35 AM PDT by CyberAnt (Drive-By Media: Fake news, fake documents, fake polls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ole Okie

I believe the AG has the authority to pull him off the case, and to dismiss the charges against Libbey.

At least that's what I would like to see happen.


11 posted on 09/02/2006 10:24:46 AM PDT by CyberAnt (Drive-By Media: Fake news, fake documents, fake polls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: Howlin

That's okay .. I didn't see the first story!


13 posted on 09/02/2006 10:26:18 AM PDT by CyberAnt (Drive-By Media: Fake news, fake documents, fake polls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

"Search" is not fun ...whenever I do it I find someone else has already posted something I want to post 3 days ago


14 posted on 09/02/2006 10:27:38 AM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: woofie

Just bump it then. :-)


15 posted on 09/02/2006 10:28:15 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt

Keyword CIALEAK brings them all up, too.


16 posted on 09/02/2006 10:28:41 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ole Okie

The AG Gonzales, I believe. This is not a congressional Spec Prosecutor, but one appointed by the AG.

It is up to Gonzales to set things straight, fire Fitzgeraled, arrest Fitzgerald and prosecute Fitzgerald for Prosecutorial Abuse and misappropriating government funds.

Unless of course, Gonzales and Bush knew all along and did nothing.

Then we would have the Paradox wrapped in an Enigma.


17 posted on 09/02/2006 10:31:09 AM PDT by Prost1 (Remember, a democrat is a friend if it is time to vote or you have money to take.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

That's good!

I don't live on this site and I would have missed the story. And .. I don't automatically search to see if there is any certain type of story before I begin reading what's already there. Maybe some people do .. but I don't.

If the site's admin has a problem with a second story .. they can take care of it - and redirect me to the first one.


18 posted on 09/02/2006 10:34:01 AM PDT by CyberAnt (Drive-By Media: Fake news, fake documents, fake polls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JerseyDvl
Exhibit A in the case against a federal journalist shield law.
19 posted on 09/02/2006 10:36:58 AM PDT by Wally_Kalbacken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

From a purely political point of view I believe it is now in the best interest of the administration to let the trial go on. The risk is only to Libby, not to Bush. On the other hand a pardon would certainly be spun by the MSM as "oh, see, they are covering up something".

Far better to let things proceed. The trail will be interesting and fun. Many famous reporters are going to have to go in the witness box and answer questions. That's great! Just the idea of seeing that sanctimonious butt-wipe Tim Russert under oath and sweating makes it worthwhile.

We can difinitively answer the question: did Libby lie to the GJ and FBI. If the answer is "no" then we have the most complete exhonoration of Bush that is possible, and even more egg on the face of the MSM, leftists, and other bush hating retards.


20 posted on 09/02/2006 10:42:13 AM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson