Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Questions About Inquiry in C.I.A. Leak
NY Slimes ^ | 09/02/06 | DAVID JOHNSTON

Posted on 09/02/2006 9:49:19 AM PDT by JerseyDvl

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: JerseyDvl
What's the over/under date for Fitzgerald's appearance on Meet the Press?

For discussion purposes, I'll set it at 9/17.

21 posted on 09/02/2006 10:47:17 AM PDT by Night Hides Not (Closing in on 3000 posts, of which maybe 50 were worthwhile!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JerseyDvl
But Mr. Armitage kept his actions secret, not even telling President Bush because the prosecutor asked him not to divulge it, the people said.

This needs emphasis. It's unsourced (naturally) but it sounds only too plausible.

So far the reaction to the Armitage revelation has been mainly to blame Armitage and the left wing press. But if this is true, then it PROVES that Fitzgerald was running a left-wing vendetta from the very first. Fitzgerald should be removed and prosecuted for abuse of his office.

22 posted on 09/02/2006 11:06:56 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JerseyDvl

It's now been reported that Armitage's calendars, obtained under the Freedom of Information Act, show that he met with reporter Bob Woodward on 6/13/03; Woodward acknowledges that someone told him about Plame around that time, and while he hasn't said that it was Armitage, Post editor Ben Bradlee has said it's likely that Armitage was his source.

According to Fitzgerald, Libby's first mention of Plame to a reporter occured TEN DAYS LATER--to Judith Miller on 6/23/03.

Yet Fitzgerald stood up in front of the entire country and made the following statement at a press conference:

"In fact, Mr. Libby was the first official known to have told a reporter [about Plame's CIA employment] when he talked to Judith Miller in June of 2003 about Valerie Wilson."

There is no reason to believe Fitzgerald was unaware that the Armitage-Woodward meeting preceded the Libby Miller discussion--it has been reported that Fitzgerald interrogated Armitage at great length.

Fitzgerald owes us a better explanation here than no comment.


23 posted on 09/02/2006 11:17:41 AM PDT by freespirited (We have met the enemy and it is Wal-Mart. ---The Democratic Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JerseyDvl
Image hosted by Photobucket.com

HA ha...
and the RATS take another one in the...

24 posted on 09/02/2006 12:12:13 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

My bad..my search was flawed.


25 posted on 09/02/2006 2:33:21 PM PDT by JerseyDvl ("If you attack Americans, we'll defend your right to do it."- The Democrat Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JerseyDvl

Two important points:

1. Armitage sat quietly and let the SP go forward *knowing* he was the source. He deliberately chose not to inform the White House.

2. How long has the NYT known about this story? I say from the beginning.


26 posted on 09/03/2006 3:17:39 AM PDT by ARW3A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson