Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sudan Orders African Troops Out Of Darfur
The Telegraph (UK) ^ | 9-4-2006 | David Blair

Posted on 09/03/2006 5:56:53 PM PDT by blam

Sudan orders African troops out of Darfur

By David Blair, Africa Correspondent

(Filed: 04/09/2006)

Sudan's regime sought to remove the only international military presence in Darfur yesterday when it demanded the withdrawal of all African Union troops from the war-torn region.

The AU, an alliance of all 53 African countries, has 5,000 troops and 2,000 civilian staff in Darfur. Crippled by incompetence and lack of resources, the mission has largely failed to protect the population.

But it has recorded numerous attacks on civilian targets mounted by Sudanese government forces and their allies from the notorious Janjaweed militia. Violence, starvation and disease have killed 300,000 people and two million more have been displaced in three years of fighting.

On Thursday, the United Nations passed Resolution 1706, calling for the deployment of a fully fledged peacekeeping mission in Darfur.

Sudan immediately rejected this measure but the AU supported it and agreed to hand over to a UN force. This has given Khartoum the pretext to demand the AU's withdrawal at the end of this month.

President Omar al-Bashir's Arab-dominated regime is preparing a major offensive against Darfur's black African rebels. Removing the only foreign troops will clear the way for this onslaught.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: african; darfur; orders; out; sudan; troops
"Removing the only foreign troops will clear the way for this onslaught."

Time for some more serious genocide.

1 posted on 09/03/2006 5:56:54 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam

Largely failed? How about a little rape on the side to boot?


2 posted on 09/03/2006 5:59:19 PM PDT by Crazieman (The Democratic Party: Culture of Treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Does Kofi know? Give him a week to see the reports and then he'll demand that Sudan sit down for talks in two months to see if he can put in some troops to observe the genocide.
3 posted on 09/03/2006 6:00:00 PM PDT by burzum (Despair not! I shall inspire you by charging blindly on!--Minsc, BG2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
"Time for some more serious genocide."

If there were oil fields there, forces from across the globe would be rushing in there to establish stability.

4 posted on 09/03/2006 6:05:19 PM PDT by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
And now Arab Muslims will continue the rape of young girls, murder, slaughter, cutting of the breasts of Christian women, killing black Muslims for allah.

I truly hate Islam and what it teaches. The sadistic teachings of mohammed should be burned.

5 posted on 09/03/2006 6:12:56 PM PDT by mosquewatch.com (No Islam, Know peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mosquewatch.com
"And now Arab Muslims will continue the rape of young girls, murder, slaughter, cutting of the breasts of Christian women, killing black Muslims for allah."

That's exactly what Darfur is all about. Isn't Islam wonderful.

6 posted on 09/03/2006 6:32:44 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: blam; mosquewatch.com; All
That's exactly what Darfur is all about. Isn't Islam wonderful.

Yeah! It's every bit as wonderful as having terminal cancer

7 posted on 09/03/2006 6:37:47 PM PDT by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: KoRn
If there were oil fields there, forces from across the globe would be rushing in there to establish stability.

The world doesn't have a strategic interest in sand.

8 posted on 09/03/2006 7:26:53 PM PDT by RedRover (I'm SO pleased that Mayor Nagin will now call that "hole in the ground" a "sacred site".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RedRover
"The world doesn't have a strategic interest in sand."

Very true. Was just making an observation.

9 posted on 09/03/2006 7:33:19 PM PDT by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: KoRn
If there were oil fields there, forces from across the globe would be rushing in there to establish stability.

If their were CNN cameras there, and potential voters, forces from across the democratic party would be rushing there to exploit.

10 posted on 09/03/2006 7:40:38 PM PDT by lawnguy (Give me some of your tots!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mosquewatch.com
I truly hate Islam and what it teaches.

I'm sure these words bring the Darfur's victims of genocide great hope. /sarc

11 posted on 09/04/2006 11:25:17 PM PDT by zimdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RedRover
The world doesn't have a strategic interest in sand.

Or more to the point: The world dosn't have a strategic interest in human lives.

12 posted on 09/04/2006 11:26:39 PM PDT by zimdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: zimdog
The world doesn't have a strategic interest in human lives.

Correct.

13 posted on 09/05/2006 4:29:52 AM PDT by RedRover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson