Skip to comments.
Sudan Orders African Troops Out Of Darfur
The Telegraph (UK) ^
| 9-4-2006
| David Blair
Posted on 09/03/2006 5:56:53 PM PDT by blam
Sudan orders African troops out of Darfur
By David Blair, Africa Correspondent
(Filed: 04/09/2006)
Sudan's regime sought to remove the only international military presence in Darfur yesterday when it demanded the withdrawal of all African Union troops from the war-torn region.
The AU, an alliance of all 53 African countries, has 5,000 troops and 2,000 civilian staff in Darfur. Crippled by incompetence and lack of resources, the mission has largely failed to protect the population.
But it has recorded numerous attacks on civilian targets mounted by Sudanese government forces and their allies from the notorious Janjaweed militia. Violence, starvation and disease have killed 300,000 people and two million more have been displaced in three years of fighting.
On Thursday, the United Nations passed Resolution 1706, calling for the deployment of a fully fledged peacekeeping mission in Darfur.
Sudan immediately rejected this measure but the AU supported it and agreed to hand over to a UN force. This has given Khartoum the pretext to demand the AU's withdrawal at the end of this month.
President Omar al-Bashir's Arab-dominated regime is preparing a major offensive against Darfur's black African rebels. Removing the only foreign troops will clear the way for this onslaught.
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: african; darfur; orders; out; sudan; troops
"Removing the only foreign troops will clear the way for this onslaught." Time for some more serious genocide.
1
posted on
09/03/2006 5:56:54 PM PDT
by
blam
To: blam
Largely failed? How about a little rape on the side to boot?
2
posted on
09/03/2006 5:59:19 PM PDT
by
Crazieman
(The Democratic Party: Culture of Treason)
To: blam
Does Kofi know? Give him a week to see the reports and then he'll demand that Sudan sit down for talks in two months to see if he can put in some troops to observe the genocide.
3
posted on
09/03/2006 6:00:00 PM PDT
by
burzum
(Despair not! I shall inspire you by charging blindly on!--Minsc, BG2)
To: blam
"Time for some more serious genocide." If there were oil fields there, forces from across the globe would be rushing in there to establish stability.
4
posted on
09/03/2006 6:05:19 PM PDT
by
KoRn
To: blam
And now Arab Muslims will continue the rape of young girls, murder, slaughter, cutting of the breasts of Christian women, killing black Muslims for allah.
I truly hate Islam and what it teaches. The sadistic teachings of mohammed should be burned.
5
posted on
09/03/2006 6:12:56 PM PDT
by
mosquewatch.com
(No Islam, Know peace.)
To: mosquewatch.com
"And now Arab Muslims will continue the rape of young girls, murder, slaughter, cutting of the breasts of Christian women, killing black Muslims for allah." That's exactly what Darfur is all about. Isn't Islam wonderful.
6
posted on
09/03/2006 6:32:44 PM PDT
by
blam
To: blam; mosquewatch.com; All
That's exactly what Darfur is all about. Isn't Islam wonderful. Yeah! It's every bit as wonderful as having terminal cancer
7
posted on
09/03/2006 6:37:47 PM PDT
by
Fiddlstix
(Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
To: KoRn
If there were oil fields there, forces from across the globe would be rushing in there to establish stability.The world doesn't have a strategic interest in sand.
8
posted on
09/03/2006 7:26:53 PM PDT
by
RedRover
(I'm SO pleased that Mayor Nagin will now call that "hole in the ground" a "sacred site".)
To: RedRover
"The world doesn't have a strategic interest in sand."Very true. Was just making an observation.
9
posted on
09/03/2006 7:33:19 PM PDT
by
KoRn
To: KoRn
If there were oil fields there, forces from across the globe would be rushing in there to establish stability.If their were CNN cameras there, and potential voters, forces from across the democratic party would be rushing there to exploit.
10
posted on
09/03/2006 7:40:38 PM PDT
by
lawnguy
(Give me some of your tots!!!)
To: mosquewatch.com
I truly hate Islam and what it teaches. I'm sure these words bring the Darfur's victims of genocide great hope. /sarc
11
posted on
09/04/2006 11:25:17 PM PDT
by
zimdog
To: RedRover
The world doesn't have a strategic interest in sand. Or more to the point: The world dosn't have a strategic interest in human lives.
12
posted on
09/04/2006 11:26:39 PM PDT
by
zimdog
To: zimdog
The world doesn't have a strategic interest in human lives.Correct.
13
posted on
09/05/2006 4:29:52 AM PDT
by
RedRover
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson