Much has been promised little delivered to date by the Peter Paul team. What, exactly, is Clinton going on trial for?
Respectfully, Doug, I think you are too involved to understand that these corrupt Klintoons are above the laws of this country. The facts don't apply with them nor the Sandy Burgulars. They have managed to buy off/threaten all adversaries & especially a bunch of liberal/coke head judges. The DBM will not report this. Please prepare yourself for a big let down. You are a great American & I do not like replying in this negative way & honestly I hope that I am 100% wrong.
I have followed it. PP ran a Hollywood fundraiser for HRC. HRC listed the contribution as laughably low in her campaign finance report. PP filed a complaint. There has been lots of back and forth, mostly it resulting in HRC's campaign (not her personally) admitting they screwed up and and filed incorrect reports. They have updated the reports. They have paid fines. Wrists have been slapped.
PP is suing HRC, for what damages? Filing bad FEC forms?
Here we get to the limit of my memory. My suspiciion is that HRC's lawyers will shut down the suit before it gets to the deposition of A-list Hollywood celebs. My suspicion is that a judge will find that PP has overstepped, and tosses his suit out on a technicality.
That seems to be how things of this type usually end up.
So, sure send me the link for the civil suit, I'll try to read it... but in the meantime, for me an others intersted in the thread what is the "elevator pitch" for the lawsuit?