Skip to comments.
Understanding Katherine Harris, why she is the good choice, why she deserves our support !
9-6-06
| Marc Costanzo
Posted on 09/06/2006 1:44:47 AM PDT by marc costanzo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 last
To: Shooter 2.5
And when the vote to support Israel is introduced, Harris will support Israel.The dem party won't.
Who said I was going to vote for the Dem?
81
posted on
09/07/2006 4:29:31 AM PDT
by
Celtjew Libertarian
("Don't take life so seriously. You'll never get out of it alive." -- Bugs Bunny)
To: marc costanzo
America is a Christian Country (not a Christian State), why cannot people of your persuasion get that fact thru your heads. Of course America is a Christian country. The majority of the people in it are Christian.
Our government is secular, Our Nation IS NOT SECULAR.
You want to tell Katherine Harris or should I? When it sounds like the candidate doesn't think the government should be secular, I get wary.
I'll probably not vote for Nelson, either. In fact, after looking over the 3rd Party candidates, I'll probably write my own name in. Not the first time I've done that.
82
posted on
09/07/2006 4:37:27 AM PDT
by
Celtjew Libertarian
("Don't take life so seriously. You'll never get out of it alive." -- Bugs Bunny)
To: Non-Sequitur
" But only Christians should join the Republican one?"
Only if they don't want to support the cause of homosexuals, lesbians, abortionists, femminists, ACLU, gun grabbers, etc.
To: marc costanzo
I will be voting for Katherine Harris for one very plain and simple reason...
It will drive the Democrats totally mad.
As for her remarks, they pale in comparison to what Democrats have not only said but done.
This is one voter that finds it refreshing to see someone take a stand and make a mark.
84
posted on
09/07/2006 4:54:23 AM PDT
by
N. Theknow
((Kennedys - Can't drive, can't fly, can't ski, can't skipper a boat - But they know what's best.))
To: Celtjew Libertarian
What do you think will happen if voters don't support Harris?
85
posted on
09/07/2006 5:03:45 AM PDT
by
Shooter 2.5
(Vote a Straight Republican Ballot. Rid the country of dems. NRA)
To: Broker
My 80+ year old mother...takes the Palm Beach Post with her to vote against all their stupid endorsements.That is a great story! LOL!
86
posted on
09/07/2006 7:25:18 AM PDT
by
NautiNurse
(Katherine Harris for U.S. Senate--It is lazy to assume that nothing in the media is fabricated)
To: Broker; All
Yes, we cannot allow ourselves to be corrupted or persuaded by the defamation against our people by the LIBERAL MASS MEDIA .
If we do, the DemoCRATS will win everytime .
87
posted on
09/07/2006 4:05:52 PM PDT
by
marc costanzo
("The Only Poll that counts, is the one at the Ballot Box" - - Truman)
To: MinnesotaLibertarian; All
>>But that's not really relevant here. The problem with Katherine Harris has nothing to do with her politics, it's her personality. Having a reputaion for throwing fits and not being able to work with people, appearing on TV sticking her chest out, making statements that imply all non-Christians are sinners, etc. These are what turn the voters off and what make her unelectable. She might be able to get the base out, but she attracts virtually no moderate or indepenent support.<<
You are sounding just like a cynical liberal there !
Or else you've allowed the POISON of the Liberal Pundits and Leftwing talshow hosts to poison your thinking .
What you imply of Katheriine Harri's pro-Christian statements is exactly what the Liberal would imply .
I'll take Katherine's personality over that of Hillary Clinton's or Cynthia McKinney's anyday<--- No GOP congressperson would ever get away with acting like a thug on Capitol Hill !
88
posted on
09/07/2006 4:11:52 PM PDT
by
marc costanzo
("The Only Poll that counts, is the one at the Ballot Box" - - Truman)
To: marc costanzo
You are sounding just like a cynical liberal there !
No, liberals are happy that she won the nomination, because she's going to lose. I'd rather see conservative Republicans elected instead of defeated. Nothing too liberal about that.
Or else you've allowed the POISON of the Liberal Pundits and Leftwing talshow hosts to poison your thinking .
I've seen the woman speak. She's frightening. No spin is necessary.
What you imply of Katheriine Harri's pro-Christian statements is exactly what the Liberal would imply .
No, they're the fears of a small-government conservative seeing a growing theocracy in the Republican Party. Christianity has nothing, repeat NOTHING, to do with conservatism. Conservatism is about smaller government, which nanny-state Christians are the antithesis of.
I'll take Katherine's personality over that of Hillary Clinton's or Cynthia McKinney's anyday<--- No GOP congressperson would ever get away with acting like a thug on Capitol Hill !
I can't stand any of them, not to mention that you're missing the point - this was a chance for Republicans to nominate a candidate who was both conservative and had the ability to win, and they blew it.
To: Shooter 2.5
What do you think will happen if voters don't support Harris? Nelson will win. And the GOP would have to waste energy defending a Senator who seems to have troubles keeping her feet out of her esophagus.
90
posted on
09/08/2006 7:54:21 AM PDT
by
Celtjew Libertarian
("Don't take life so seriously. You'll never get out of it alive." -- Bugs Bunny)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson