Skip to comments.
Democratic Reaction to Pathway To 9-11, The Enormous Implications
9/8/2006
| Technomage
Posted on 09/08/2006 10:27:17 AM PDT by technomage
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-116 next last
To: technomage
This convulsion is happening because the rats just launched their theme to get congress back this year and Hill in 2008. That theme depends of americans foggy forgetfulness of how inadequate the rats were in defending america. They almost got the public to believe that pubs are making them less safe. Almost. And noone in Hill's army wants monica or Bill Vs. OBL brought up.
To: houston1
BS! You didn't have Republican senators writing letters threatening to revoke CBS license.
Take that moral equivalence crap elsewhere.
22
posted on
09/08/2006 10:46:34 AM PDT
by
dfwgator
To: dfwgator
also...didn't they just move the movie to another TV station? Without re-edits?
23
posted on
09/08/2006 10:48:56 AM PDT
by
halo66
To: Darkwolf377
Bush-Hatred Fatigue? That would be good for the public. But the evil Pow'rs arrayed agin'em never tire.
To: technomage
Can the DNC, these senators, be prosecuted by Disney? Or be prosecuted by the American Public?
What is the legal recourse? How do we hold them accountable?
25
posted on
09/08/2006 10:50:22 AM PDT
by
EBH
(All great truths begin as blasphemies. GB Shaw)
To: Nanny7
I presume there are uncut/unedited versions out there.
Rush has one! I don't know if he could legally reproduce it or show it on the Net.
26
posted on
09/08/2006 10:51:04 AM PDT
by
wolfcreek
(You can spit in our tacos and you can rape our dogs but, you can't take away our freedom!)
To: Jacquerie
Line is busy, they might be getting an ear full!
27
posted on
09/08/2006 10:51:24 AM PDT
by
schu
To: Sgt_Schultze
Can you say "so long FCC license" ? I thought you could.
To: houston1
similar in kind but not degree. refresh my memory here but were the repubs successful in attaining approval rights or blocking the showing?
29
posted on
09/08/2006 10:54:40 AM PDT
by
Nanny7
To: technomage
The Constitution guarantees that only flattering things can be said about Democrat/liberals.
Otherwise, it might hurt their feelings, and they could suffer from irreparable low self-esteem.
30
posted on
09/08/2006 10:55:40 AM PDT
by
MikeHu
To: technomage
The Democrat party has a long history of corruption, murder, jack-booted beatings and stalking of opponents and critics (saw some of that under the Clintonista reign of terror), voter fraud, mob ties, working feverishly to get felons into the voting booth, working day and night to tear down the nation and fabric, terrorist supporting and sympathizing and now they are even further to the Hate-America-Left. They try as hard as they can to keep their true agendas and ideologies hidden, but it just doesn't hold up to the light of facts and truth.
To: wolfcreek
Bet there'll be blackmarket copies around... not from Rush, though. He's got to stay squeaky-clean with that target on his back.
32
posted on
09/08/2006 10:56:50 AM PDT
by
Nanny7
To: technomage
To: Nanny7
I think this is going to backfire on the dems bad.
Everyone will think what are they hiding? And the points of contention will become even more focused on by the blogosphere exposing the facts to even more people then it every would have before they raised a stink.
They are afraid and they are panicing at the facts getting out.
To: veronica
35
posted on
09/08/2006 11:01:55 AM PDT
by
READINABLUESTATE
(free speech for thee but not for me?)
To: houston1
I actually have no problem what so ever with the DUmmies of the world petitioning ABC, or Boycotting Disney, or calling their local stations to criticize the movie. In fact, I am 100% behind those types of actions (think the Reagan movie, or the Dixie Chicks, etc.). What I am against is the blatantly Unconstitutional role of Senate Democrats threatening to use the FCC against them if they run this movie. That, IMHO, is a direct violation of the "Congress shall make no laws...." First Amendment violation.
36
posted on
09/08/2006 11:02:04 AM PDT
by
codercpc
To: epluribus_2
Not so much fatigue as saturation. I mean, if you're gonna hate him by now, you hate him. But Clinton has gotten SUCH a free ride, and there's no other outlet for the rage this will produce other than taking it out on his party.
To: Nanny7
whichever network it was supposed to be on (CBS I think) pulled it because of the protests, I think it went to showtime
38
posted on
09/08/2006 11:05:49 AM PDT
by
houston1
To: Names Ash Housewares
I agree. Can the MSM bury this story? Doubtful.
39
posted on
09/08/2006 11:06:16 AM PDT
by
Nanny7
To: dfwgator
so you think CBS aired it then?
40
posted on
09/08/2006 11:07:02 AM PDT
by
houston1
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-116 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson