To: don-o
The law gives him a presumption of innocence. Besides, we don't know that he killed a cop. His surgeon might have done that with a bungled job.
This is for the courts now.
12 posted on
09/08/2006 7:07:48 PM PDT by
muawiyah
To: muawiyah
Do you have rigormortis of the brain? Can you even think? Or are you a democrat party abortion survivor with diminished capacity for thought?
19 posted on
09/08/2006 8:12:37 PM PDT by
lwoodham
To: muawiyah
Besides, we don't know that he killed a cop. His surgeon might have done that with a bungled job.He wouldn't have been in any *danger* from a surgeon if the piece of filth had not shot him. The blame rests on it.
It's too bad it's in the courts hands. Sure way to guarantee that justice will not be done.
20 posted on
09/08/2006 8:21:31 PM PDT by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: muawiyah
Besides, we don't know that he killed a cop. His surgeon might have done that with a bungled job. Oh, bullshit.
22 posted on
09/08/2006 8:25:01 PM PDT by
jude24
("I will oppose the sword if it's not wielded well, because my enemies are men like me.")
To: muawiyah
The law gives him a presumption of innocence. Besides, we don't know that he killed a cop. His surgeon might have done that with a bungled job. Are you for real? Was it the surgeon who put the bullet(s) into the cop?
33 posted on
09/09/2006 4:48:45 AM PDT by
ContraryMary
(New Jersey -- Superfund cleanup capital of the U.S.A.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson