Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Armitage leak admission creates new questions
MSNBC ^ | September 9, 2006 | Associated Press

Posted on 09/09/2006 3:48:25 AM PDT by libstripper

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: mware
What stuns me about this question is that MSNBC actually asked it

Me too, mware.

21 posted on 09/09/2006 7:24:31 AM PDT by meema (I am a Conservative Traditional Republican, NOT an elitist, sexist, cynic or right wing extremist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: patriot_wes

Elliot Spitzer.


22 posted on 09/09/2006 7:34:41 AM PDT by xarmydog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: meema; mware
What stuns me about this question is that MSNBC actually asked it

The MSM wants the Libby case killed. They don't want their reporters called to testify at the Libby trial. It could get very embarassing for folks like Russert who is the key prosecution witness in convicting Libby. It is now readily apparent that a number of reporters knew the identity of Wilson's wife and the source was not Libby. Andrea Mitchell did not make a mistake when she said that her identity was common knowledge.

23 posted on 09/09/2006 7:36:20 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: libstripper
I do not think people know just who Joe Wilson was/is. (sarcasm)


http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/docs/wilson.interview.pdf
24 posted on 09/09/2006 7:37:42 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #25 Removed by Moderator

To: kabar
IIRC one of the main elements of the indictment of Libby is the allegation that he deliberately lied when he said his knowledge of Plame at the time came from reporters. The indictment buttresses this position by essentially charging that all of his knowledge came from internal governmental sources. Now we know an indeterminate number of reporters learned about Plame's status before Libby spoke to Miller, Cooper, and Russert. Hence, there's a reasonable doubt about whether he deliberately lied in his testimony.
26 posted on 09/09/2006 7:52:19 AM PDT by libstripper (!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

" Former Republican Sen. Fred Thompson, who has criticized Libby’s prosecution,
said Fitzgerald had a duty to set the record straight yet continued to urge Armitage’s silence. ..."

“The whole world was watching Mr. Fitzgerald,” Thompson said.
“He had an extremely narrow focus and a lot of pressure to come up with something or somebody.
He came up with a pea and tried to hold a press conference and hold it up as an elephant.”

Fred Thompson would make a great addition to the Republican ticket in 08.


27 posted on 09/09/2006 8:11:33 AM PDT by Wild Irish Rogue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wolf24
Honestly, I think the story has just become to darn complicated to be worth following or investigating at this point. I think its time to move on.

Sincerely,

Chris Matthews

co-sign: Sidney Blumenthal
co-sign: Chuckie Schumer
co-sign: Patty Fitzy

The Emily Lettela of the Junk Media. Lie hype and distort then when it bites you on the butt say "Never mind"

Sorry Junk Media. Doesn't work that way anymore. Your credibility is on the line now every day. When you go out and get it so wrong for so long, many of us want to know somethings.

I want to know who the "Source close to the investigation tells us that Friz will be handing down 27 indicmets reaching to the highest levels of the White House" and the other propaganda blast you made up was?

Could it be all that Junk Media reporting before Fritzmus was nothing more then Democrat Campaign propaganda?

Actions have consequences Mr Matthews

28 posted on 09/09/2006 8:12:22 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Say Leftists. How many Nazis did killing Nazis in WW2 create? Samurai? Fascists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Wild Irish Rogue
“He had an extremely narrow focus and a lot of pressure to come up with something or somebody. He came up with a pea and tried to hold a press conference and hold it up as an elephant.”

Why was he so anxious to "come up with something" when, from the get go of the investigation, he knew the real leaker and knew there was no underlying crime? His professional obligation, right then, was to announce those facts and close the investigation, but he didn't. The only reasonable conclusion is he had and retains deeply corrupt motives for going on with the investigation and prosecution.

Again, we go to his background where we see that he had come to the end of his career trajectory and needed a way to advance. Gerald Nadler didn't just "like" him; Nadler actually suggested he be the Hezbocrats' impeachment counsel. Nadler is long time NYC congressman and Fitz gained his initial reputation throughout the 90's working in the the NYC US Attorney's office under Mary Jo White, a Reno/Clinton appointee. There's a good chance Nadler got to know him reasonably well in that position, at least well enough to recommend him as a potential impeachment counsel. Hence, it's logical to use a little historical novelist's speculation to fill in the dots and conclude that Fitz is pursuing Libby in the corrupt hope of becoming AG in a future Clinton administration.

29 posted on 09/09/2006 8:29:57 AM PDT by libstripper (!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

I want to know when Fitzgerald is going to be disbarred for prosecutorial misconduct. We already know all the rest which was nothing more than a Seinfield "scandal."


30 posted on 09/09/2006 8:38:44 AM PDT by RichardW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #31 Removed by Moderator

To: RichardW
The real scandal here is Fitzgerald's news conference announcing Libby's indictment, where he said Libby was the leaker even though he knew Armitage was the real leaker and had decided early on there was no underlying crime and Armitage wouldn't be the target of the investigation. In other words, if there's a real liar here, it's Fitzgerald, not Libby.
32 posted on 09/09/2006 8:43:37 AM PDT by libstripper (!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

" Nadler actually suggested he be the Hezbocrats' impeachment counsel. "

Another thought on the Dems love of Fitz.
By accounts from his friends-Fitzgerald could charitably be described as eccentric .
I bet the Dems felt they could easily manipulate him.
Joe Wilson told Olbermann that he met with Fitz early on in the investigation and laid out the whole scenario for him.
Fitz was either so naive and such a rube, that he bought Wilson's story- hook, line and sinker or he was willingly in the tanks for the Dems.
Fitzgerald's bizarre conduct in this witch hunt should make someone at Justice revisit and scrutinize any of his previous cases.


33 posted on 09/09/2006 9:47:51 AM PDT by Wild Irish Rogue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: kabar

Wilson said he went to the State Department before he ever went to Niger to see if his trip was OK with them. So if this is correct the State Department knew about this at least Feb. 2002.


34 posted on 09/09/2006 10:00:44 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Condor51

What you said.


35 posted on 09/09/2006 10:05:53 AM PDT by Buckhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Wild Irish Rogue
I bet the Dems felt they could easily manipulate him.

Now why would they ever feel such a thing? Could it be because Fitz spent his entire early and mid-career in NYC under the direct supervision of Mary Jo White, aka "Mary Jo Whitewash," the Clinton/Reno US Attorney and she and the other NY Hezbocrats got to know him very well and got his number? This certainly explains, better than anything else, his bizarre and unethical conduct, especially going on with the case when he knew there was no underlying crime and concealing the entire Armitage aspect at the press conference where he announced the Libby indictment.

36 posted on 09/09/2006 10:59:37 AM PDT by libstripper (!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: kabar
"Armitage and Powell failed to notify the WH over five months "

Yes, that is a very interesting question.

I'd assume that the media had something on them and threatened them to keep silent so the attacks on Rove could continue.

Frankly I can think of no other explanantion.

37 posted on 09/09/2006 2:21:29 PM PDT by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
Wilson said he went to the State Department before he ever went to Niger to see if his trip was OK with them. So if this is correct the State Department knew about this at least Feb. 2002.

I don't recall reading that, but every USG visitor to a country must obtain country clearance from the Ambassador. The CIA would have to inform State before the fact why Wilson was going. State had to know before Wilson embarked on his trip.

38 posted on 09/09/2006 3:57:55 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: kabar

My post of #24 the link is an interview of Joe Wilson done in September 2003, and he says among other things he went to the State Department to get their OK.

He also says that when he went to Langley to brief them (CIA) that State Department people were at the meeting, this was before he went to Niger. So at least CIA and the State Department knew about Joe and his mission, not sure anyone informed the White House.



39 posted on 09/09/2006 7:14:08 PM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson