Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate: Saddam believed Al-Qaida was a threat, not ally
Associated Press ^ | Sep 9, 10:06 AM (ET) | Jim Abrams

Posted on 09/09/2006 8:07:18 AM PDT by rubeng

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 last
To: ikez78
someone should have thought about how this would be distorted before they agreed to so limit the scope so that a final assessment wasn't actually being attempted.. Because the record is now unlikely to ever be corrected.

I am deeply distressed with Republican leadership that doesn't seem to have any clue how to deal with the willingness of the explosion of distortions and outright lies that are being applied to the President.

Witness the backlash about "The Path to 911" where the truth is actively being suppressed in a firestorm of charges of "inaccuracy."

Why can't we muster such firestorms?

101 posted on 09/10/2006 7:05:07 AM PDT by dalight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: dalight

I don't want to see suppression but at least get out there and give your version of the story.

Since when is a report from the Senate above criticism?


102 posted on 09/10/2006 7:52:28 AM PDT by ikez78 (www.regimeofterror.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
the WMD argument was the wrong argument to make

I don't think it was.

The Administration believed that we face a grave threat from the Muslim world. They believed our approach to it was failing and had to be changed - quickly and drastically. They believed 911 afforded them a unique opportunity to do so.

The WMD and terrorist connection arguments were the only ones they had which might work. Logical appeals to strategic and tactical thinking, morality, civilized values...all were losers sure to drag out endlessly no matter how correct they were.

So they framed the arguments with as much urgency as they could while allowing for uncertainties, emphasizing that modern weapons allowed for few mistakes in judgement.

Backlash was inevitable. If one believes in the basic Administration position then not finding vast stocks of WMD was a good thing. It means we acted in time. If one doesn't then not finding such stocks is proof the government was lying about the urgency of the threat.

Congressional investigations are a good thing. They will clarify many issues of fact and provide insights for better analysis. But they won't resolve the fundamental questions.

103 posted on 09/10/2006 7:58:19 AM PDT by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson