Skip to comments.
Senators Feinstein and Leahy Call for New Policy on Use of Cluster Bombs
California Chronicle ^
| 5 SEPT 2006
| California Political Desk
Posted on 09/09/2006 10:32:29 AM PDT by radar101
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
When was the last time we had an enemy in uniform, in an organized military unit?
1
posted on
09/09/2006 10:32:30 AM PDT
by
radar101
To: radar101
When was the last time we had an enemy in uniform, in an organized military unit?
The clown suits worn at the 2004 Dim National Convention.
2
posted on
09/09/2006 10:33:56 AM PDT
by
peyton randolph
(No man knows the day nor the hour of The Coming of The Great White Handkerchief.)
To: radar101
Jesus... our goverment tackling the issues that do not matter.. and flushing down the toilet the the ones that do matter... like WoT, Illegals and so on
3
posted on
09/09/2006 10:34:02 AM PDT
by
Cinnamon
To: radar101
Yep, they are more worried about cluster bombs used against the enemy than car bombs used on our troops or flying Claymores used against Israeli citizens.
4
posted on
09/09/2006 10:34:35 AM PDT
by
dirtboy
(This tagline has been photoshopped)
To: radar101
Senators Feinstein and Leahy Call for New Policy on Use of Cluster BombsI can think of at least two places to insert one.
5
posted on
09/09/2006 10:36:11 AM PDT
by
facedown
(Armed in the Heartland)
To: radar101
“The human death toll and injury from these weapons are felt every day. What's she referring to? Cluster bombs or passenger jets?
6
posted on
09/09/2006 10:36:20 AM PDT
by
EGPWS
To: radar101
Disarm now, Sureender now. Roll out the Burkas for the women,... and if the Dims and other lefties fear a 'evangelic theocracy' running the US how will they feel about a Moslem mullah lead theoracy running the country. first of all all the female dems in the government will be kick out and probably killed if they don't convert to islam
7
posted on
09/09/2006 10:37:01 AM PDT
by
GreyFriar
( (3rd Armored Division - Spearhead))
To: radar101
Unexploded cluster bombs fuel anger and resentment
Always ready to make excuses for the 'hate America' crowd.
8
posted on
09/09/2006 10:37:33 AM PDT
by
kinoxi
To: dirtboy
what about the over 2500 rockets blindly shot into israel? What about the ones ferrying shrapnel? Who and what were they intended for? I know, I know, they were for peaceful purposes.
To: radar101
The sheer numbers of CBU;s in the article (2,000,000) is a good indication of how much our military depends and uses them.
The Dems are trying their damndest to emasculate our military.
So, what is different?
10
posted on
09/09/2006 10:39:27 AM PDT
by
Lokibob
(Spelling and typos are copyrighted. Please do not use.)
To: radar101
The amendment was voted down on September 6 by a 70-30 margin. What a waste of time by the moonbat senators.
11
posted on
09/09/2006 10:40:09 AM PDT
by
jazusamo
(DIANA IREY for Congress, PA 12th District: Retire murtha.)
To: radar101
These military experts are right. We should just stick with napalm, WP, and flamethrowers.
12
posted on
09/09/2006 10:41:08 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
To: radar101
We can't possibly let these people run the country.
13
posted on
09/09/2006 10:41:36 AM PDT
by
golfisnr1
(look at a map)
To: radar101
Another set of handcuffs for our military. With "Senators" like these two buffoons, who needs Islamofascists?
14
posted on
09/09/2006 10:42:26 AM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(Socialism/Communism is not "progressive." It dates back to the Neanderthals.)
To: radar101
The Democratic Party: disarming America since 1972.
15
posted on
09/09/2006 10:45:14 AM PDT
by
pierrem15
(Charles Martel: past and future of France)
To: peyton randolph
These are two more of the fifth columnists!
To: jazusamo
Still, there were 30 imbeciles and defeatists willing to vote for it, almost 1/3 of the US Senate.
What a pack of mindless gasbags.
17
posted on
09/09/2006 10:46:37 AM PDT
by
pierrem15
(Charles Martel: past and future of France)
To: radar101
If cluster bombs are really that "ineffectual" why does our military use them?
I don't buy the failure rate is that high.
18
posted on
09/09/2006 10:47:25 AM PDT
by
Crazieman
(The Democratic Party: Culture of Treason)
To: radar101
The bill should be named the terrorist protection act of 2006.
AKA the Iranian Nuclear Development Act
19
posted on
09/09/2006 10:48:46 AM PDT
by
rwilson99
(R) South Park)
To: radar101
Also, IMHO, any such law is clearly unconstitutional.
The Congress cannot use the power of the purse to give specific commands such as ROE's to the troops: this usurps the President's powers as CINC.
20
posted on
09/09/2006 10:49:01 AM PDT
by
pierrem15
(Charles Martel: past and future of France)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson