Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tim Russert Plays Dirty Pool With VP Cheney's Old "Pretty Well Confirmed" Remark
Newsbusters.org ^ | 10 September 2006 | Dave Pierre

Posted on 09/10/2006 5:41:18 PM PDT by infoguy

On today's episode of Meet the Press (Sunday, September 10, 2006), Tim Russert interviewed Vice President Cheney. In the interview, Russert took issue with the fact that the Vice President once stated on his show that it was "pretty well confirmed" that Mohammed Atta, one of the 9/11 hijackers, met with Iraqi intelligence in Prague in April 2001.

Here's the craftiness by Russert: Mr. Cheney made the "pretty well confirmed" remark in a December 9, 2001, appearance, over four-and-a-half years ago. Russert failed to inform his audience this morning when the remark was originally made. In addition, in three following appearances on Meet the Press (3/02, 9/02, and 9/03), when the Vice President breached the topic of the Atta-Prague allegation, he essentially told Russert that he "[didn't] know" if the visit occurred, that it was "unconfirmed," and that intelligence had been unable "to nail down a close tie between the al-Qaida organization and Saddam Hussein." The Vice President's stance on the issue was certainly modified from the one he originally aired in 2001.

In fact, in the very last appearance that the Vice President made on Meet the Press (in September 2003), Mr. Cheney specifically told Russert that "we just don't know" if such a meeting ever happened. Yet this morning Russert harked back to the original 2001 appearance over four-and-a-half years ago to try and hammer the Vice President for the "pretty well confirmed" words. Fairness, anyone? Not at all.

With links to the transcripts, here's the Vice President speaking on the issue in his three previous appearances on Meet the Press. Again, all three took place after his December 2001 appearance in which he made the "pretty well confirmed" remark.

1. Mr. Cheney on Meet the Press, 9/14/03 (emphasis mine):

VICE PRES. CHENEY: With respect to 9/11, of course you've had the story that's been publicly out there: The Czechs alleged that Mohamed Atta, the lead attacker, met in Prague with a senior Iraqi intelligence official five months before the attack. But we've never been able to develop any more of that yet, either in terms of confirming it or discrediting it. We just don't know.

2. Mr. Cheney on Meet the Press, 9/8/02 (emphasis mine):

VICE PRES. CHENEY: Well, I want to be very careful about how I say this. I’m not here today to make a specific allegation that Iraq was somehow responsible for 9/11. I can’t say that. On the other hand, since we did that interview, new information has come to light. And we spent time looking at that relationship between Iraq, on the one hand, and the al-Qaeda organization on the other. And there has been reporting that suggests that there have been a number of contacts over the years. We’ve seen in connection with the hijackers, of course, Mohamed Atta, who was the lead hijacker, did apparently travel to Prague on a number of occasions. And on at least one occasion, we have reporting that places him in Prague with a senior Iraqi intelligence official a few months before the attack on the World Trade Center. The debates about, you know, was he there or wasn’t he there, again, it’s the intelligence business.

RUSSERT: What does the CIA say about that and the president?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: It’s credible. But, you know, I think a way to put it would be it’s unconfirmed at this point. We’ve got...

RUSSERT: Anything else?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: There is - again, I want to separate out 9/11, from the other relationships between Iraq and the al-Qaeda organization ...

3. Mr. Cheney on Meet the Press, 3/24/02 (emphasis mine):

VICE PRES. CHENEY: [on Iraq] ... With respect to the connections to al-Qaida, we haven't been able to pin down any connection there. I read this report with interest after our interview last fall. We discovered, and it's since been public, the allegation that one of the lead hijackers, Mohamed Atta, had, in fact, met with Iraqi intelligence in Prague, but we've not been able yet from our perspective to nail down a close tie between the al-Qaida organization and Saddam Hussein. We'll continue to look for it.

As you can see, as he learned more information on the matter, the Vice President significantly modified his position on the Atta-Prague issue since he uttered the "pretty well confirmed" words in December 2001. Yet Russert twice referenced those words on the show today (see transcript below).

(By the way, those who scream that the Bush administration was bent on finding a 9/11 - Saddam link ever since September 11 should take note of what Vice President Cheney said to Russert only five days after 9/11/2001 on Meet the Press:

RUSSERT: Do we have any evidence linking Saddam Hussein or Iraqis to this operation? [Sept. 11 attacks]

VICE PRES. CHENEY: No.

Pretty clear, isn't it?)

=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+

TRANSCRIPT, Meet the Press, September 10, 2006:

RUSSERT: And now we have the Select Committee on Intelligence coming out with a report on Friday, it says here, “A declassified report released [Friday] by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence revealed that U.S. intelligence analysts were strongly disputing the alleged links between Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda while senior Bush administration officials were publicly asserting those links to justify invading Iraq.”

You said here that it was pretty well confirmed that Atta may have had a meeting in Prague, that that was credible. All the while, according to the Senate Intelligence Committee in January and in June and in September, the CIA was saying that wasn’t the case. And then the president...

VICE PRES. CHENEY: Well, let me, let me—on that—well, go ahead.

RUSSERT: No, go ahead.

VICE PRES. CHENEY: No, I want a, I want a chance to jump on that.

RUSSERT: OK, but, but you said it was pretty well confirmed that it was credible and now the Senate Intelligence Committee says not true, the CIA was waving you off.

VICE PRES. CHENEY: No --

RUSSERT: Any suggestion there was a meeting with Mohamed Atta, one of the hijackers, with Iraqi officials?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: (unintelligible) The sequence, Tim, was, when you and I talked that morning, we had not received any reporting with respect to Mohamed Atta going to Prague. Just a few days after you and I did that show, the CIA, CIA produced an intelligence report from the Czech Intelligence Service that said Mohammad Atta, leader of the hijackers, had been in Prague in April of ‘01 and had met with a senior Iraqi intelligence official in Prague. That was the first report we had that he’d been to Prague and met with Iraqis. Later on, some period of time after that, the CIA produced another report based on a photographer—on a photograph that was taken in Prague of a man they claim 70 percent probability was Mohammad Atta on another occasion. This was the reporting we received from the CIA when I responded to your question and said it had been pretty well confirmed that he’d been in Prague. The—later on, they were unable to confirm it. Later on, they backed off of it.

But what I told you was exactly what we were receiving at the time. It never said, and I don’t believe I ever said, specifically, that it linked the Iraqis to 9/11. It specifically said he had been in Prague, Mohamed Atta had been in Prague and we didn’t know...

(snip)

RUSSERT: And the meeting with Atta did not occur?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: Uh. We don’t know. I mean, we’ve never been able to, to, to link it, and the FBI and CIA have worked it aggressively. I would say, at this point, nobody has been able to confirm ...

+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+

"Pretty well conformed"? Yes, it's pretty well confirmed that Russert set out to besmirch the Vice President.

(RELATED READING: Much of the detailed reporting on the Atta-Prague issue has come from a man named Edward Jay Epstein. The most recent article I found from him on this issue is from November 2005, "Atta in Prague? An Iraqi prisoner holds the answer to this 9/11 mystery." The bottom line: "[L]ike many other intelligence cases that become politicized, the Prague connection, and all that led up to it, [has been] consigned to a murky limbo.")



TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: atta; cheney; fifthanniversary; iraq; meetthepress; prague; russert

1 posted on 09/10/2006 5:41:20 PM PDT by infoguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: infoguy
I truly despise Tim Russert. He's a smarmy, self-important DNC hack. Useless waste of human flesh.
2 posted on 09/10/2006 5:48:00 PM PDT by CremeSaver (I don't repeat gossip, so listen carefully.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: infoguy

Tim Russert looks exactly like the little boy monster in the Charles Adams cartoons.


3 posted on 09/10/2006 5:49:26 PM PDT by sandra_789 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: infoguy

Hugh Hewitt refers to 'Meet the Press' as 'Meet the Cuomo Aide'. I guess Russert just can't help his natural bias. I am always appalled by those who think that former Dem operatives are interested in showing both sides of the political spectrum. They have only one approach to any issue---using the talking points from the DNC.


4 posted on 09/10/2006 5:51:30 PM PDT by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: infoguy

I thought at the time that the story was probably true. But George Tenet moved heaven and earth to deny it, for political reasons.

I trust Czech intelligence ahead of George Tenet any day of the week. Which is to say, I don't trust George Tenet any further than I could kick him.

All that's neither here nor there, of course. Whether he was there or not, it's still a typical smarmy smear job.


5 posted on 09/10/2006 6:01:11 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: infoguy

And yet, Tim has never had the balls to ask the impeached former president about his rape of Juanita Broadrick - an event the former president has never himself, publicly denied.


7 posted on 09/10/2006 6:14:02 PM PDT by Nomorjer Kinov (If the opposite of "pro" is "con" , what is the opposite of progress?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: infoguy

Russert is an unabashed sycophant whore for the democrat party. His treachery is never far below the surface. He is working his ass off right now to blunt the effect of the Path To 911 movie so his hero the degenerate clinton will not be harmed and the democrat party will not be exposed as the aiding and abetting traitors they are. Russert is scum, the same sort of democrat scum that MSNBC employs daily in their service to their demidog democrats, like Matthews, et al.


8 posted on 09/10/2006 6:16:29 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: infoguy

Did Cheney ask Potatohead when he first learned that Armitage was the leak and whether he testified to that fact??

Pray for W and Our Freedom Fighters


9 posted on 09/10/2006 6:17:42 PM PDT by bray (Koffi 4 Food has Failed.......Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
I trust Czech intelligence ahead of George Tenet any day of the week.

Of course, Czech intelligence is not full of Clintonistas.

10 posted on 09/10/2006 6:18:45 PM PDT by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: infoguy

Does that dork have that job for life or what?


11 posted on 09/10/2006 6:18:48 PM PDT by Thebaddog (Labs Rules! Brilliant!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: infoguy

Russert is not worthy to even sit in the same room as VP Cheney. I've never felt that way until today. That program was pathetic.


12 posted on 09/10/2006 6:19:55 PM PDT by SnarlinCubBear (Save the Earth - it's the only planet with chocolate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: infoguy

Tim Russert is a former Democrat politico.


13 posted on 09/10/2006 6:31:43 PM PDT by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: infoguy

russert could very well be a replacement for jack nicholson in the shining......
heeeeere's timmmmy!!!! (there timmy is, breaking through the door of
the rnc)


14 posted on 09/10/2006 6:37:57 PM PDT by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: infoguy

Tim Russert aka "Mr. Potato Head".

15 posted on 09/10/2006 6:40:20 PM PDT by Wiggins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: infoguy
VP Cheney out thought, out maneuvered, out crafted and outclassed Tim Russert on MTP this morning. Russert was at his usually transparent best.

Don't ever screw with Dick Cheney!

16 posted on 09/10/2006 6:51:26 PM PDT by Reagan Man (Conservatives don't support amnesty and conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: infoguy

Russert has gone round the bend with his hatred of the GOP, and especially Bush and Cheney.
I'm going to watch him on election day in Nov. If the Dems don't win both the House and Senate, his head will explode. That would be "must-see-tv". :-)


17 posted on 09/10/2006 6:53:30 PM PDT by speekinout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: infoguy

Just remember, Big Russ would never vote for a Republican. That acorn did not fall far from the tree.


18 posted on 09/10/2006 6:55:40 PM PDT by Temple Owl (Excelsior! Onward and upward.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: infoguy

Who gives a rip if it was "confirmed" about Atta.

Saddam Hussein harbored hundreds of mid-level terrorists inside the Baghdad triangle.

He was another pillar in the Islamo-nutball army that was building power to attack America and/or American interests.


19 posted on 09/10/2006 7:08:02 PM PDT by Edit35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Temple Owl

Big Russ sired Big Wuss.


20 posted on 09/10/2006 7:08:03 PM PDT by Doctor Raoul (New York Times? Get a rope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye
"I am always appalled by those who think that former Dem operatives are interested in showing both sides of the political spectrum."

Including Fox's own non-fox Greta von Cistern.

yitbos

21 posted on 09/10/2006 7:22:16 PM PDT by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds. " - Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Raoul
I still think that after Timmy kept repeating questions regarding Libby - even after the vice president told him it's a pending legal case and that's all he would say about it - that the vice president should have reached over and given ol' Timmy a noogie, right there on camera.
22 posted on 09/10/2006 7:29:45 PM PDT by aligncare (In warfare, the only moral stance is to win)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: infoguy

Stop watching that SMARMY Potatoe head!! Hwe is DISPICABLE!! Even RUSh is seeing thru that POS.


23 posted on 09/10/2006 7:42:39 PM PDT by Suzy Quzy ("When Cabals Go Kabooms"....upcoming book on Mary McCarthy's Coup-Plotters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Raoul

Big Wuss! Love it! lol


24 posted on 09/10/2006 7:43:31 PM PDT by Temple Owl (Excelsior! Onward and upward.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: infoguy

I would have given anything for Cheney to ask him about his TESTIMONY and his INVOLVEMENT in the Plame affair!!


25 posted on 09/10/2006 7:44:15 PM PDT by Suzy Quzy ("When Cabals Go Kabooms"....upcoming book on Mary McCarthy's Coup-Plotters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: infoguy

I have no idea why this administration is still giving the MSM interviews with all the knowledge that they are just out to bash them?


26 posted on 09/10/2006 7:50:53 PM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
I don't need a picture of Saddam hugging Bin Laden to convince me that he was helping terrorist.The fact that he was paying Palestinian terrorist $25k to murder Jews was enough evidence for me.I think this is another non issue being exploited and blown out of proportion by the liberals who want us to lose the war.They only question the removal of Saddam because it was done by a republican.
27 posted on 09/10/2006 8:01:38 PM PDT by peeps36 (Rebuild Iraq's Army And Send It Over To Kick Iran In The Teeth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: peeps36

Oh, yes. Plus Saddam had several terrorist training camps. There's not much doubt that he was funding terrorists, backing them with professional help, and giving them shelter.

I don't question taking out Saddam. I'm just sorry we didn't go on to deal with Syria when we had the chance.


28 posted on 09/10/2006 8:16:10 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: infoguy

bump


29 posted on 09/10/2006 9:05:59 PM PDT by lowbridge (I want to die peacefully in my sleep like my grandfather. Not screaming, like his passengers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson