To: lormand
GB41 lost not because of Periot, but because he could not prove to enough people he was worthy of their support. He lost period (personal responciblity it is a conservative value, or was.)
13 posted on
09/12/2006 7:37:46 AM PDT by
Hydroshock
( (Proverbs 22:7). The rich ruleth over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender.)
To: Hydroshock
No he didn't, he lost because stupid people followed a Judas goat. And got a Dem goat for President, and darn if they didn't do the same thing four years later. Perot hated GHW Bush and used his money to deny him the Presidency. After eight years of Dems even Perot decided he'd rather have a Bush...probably because he got hit with higher taxes from the ever grateful Dems and could watch his stock money plunging to the depths.
To: Hydroshock
It's not whom you "vote for" or whom you "support", it's whom you elect. If you supported Perot, then you elected Clinton.
I am amazed at people who treat their vote like an ugly girl treats her virginity -- loudly proclaiming her unwillingness to give away that which nobody wants.
132 posted on
09/12/2006 9:57:15 AM PDT by
AmishDude
(`[N]on-state actors' can project force around the world more easily than Canada". -- Mark Steyn)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson