Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Letter to DoJ - Investigate Democrat Senators Who Threatened Disney/ABC
09/12/2006 | Doc Farmer

Posted on 09/12/2006 8:34:00 AM PDT by DocFarmer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: DocFarmer

I think you might think about making this (or something a little less wordy) an op-ed to a conservative leaning newspaper....


21 posted on 09/12/2006 8:54:02 AM PDT by goodnesswins (I think the real problem is islamo-bombia! (Rummyfan))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trustandobey

I thought about that, but since Slick Willie wasn't a signatory to the letter, and did not make an official "threat" of government action against Disney/ABC, I don't think the charges could be applied to him.


22 posted on 09/12/2006 8:54:48 AM PDT by DocFarmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins

Already did, to an extent -


http://www.chronwatch.com/content/contentDisplay.asp?aid=23630


23 posted on 09/12/2006 8:55:28 AM PDT by DocFarmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: toddlintown
I bet before Gonzales even gets a whiff of it... Jaime GORElick will have already deleted it from her laptop... with a chuckle.
24 posted on 09/12/2006 8:59:56 AM PDT by johnny7 (“And what's Fonzie like? Come on Yolanda... what's Fonzie like?!”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

I thought she didn't work there anymore...


25 posted on 09/12/2006 9:04:36 AM PDT by DocFarmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: DocFarmer

I think it's a great letter and you sound just like a lawyer (musta typed it from a Holiday Inn Express). Saying a prayer for positive results.


26 posted on 09/12/2006 9:05:19 AM PDT by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
and you sound just like a lawyer

Geez, there's no reason to get insulting... :D
27 posted on 09/12/2006 9:07:37 AM PDT by DocFarmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SolidSupplySide
Actually, he probably is (tilting at windmills) but in an era where not being allowed to produce simulated kid porn can be adjudged as against the first amendment, I would say that a bunch of Senators using official stationery to infer ABC's right to broadcast would be taken away might be illegal.

I mean, if Bush sent a letter to CBS inferring the same for their biased broadcasting, you know the ACLU would be all over it. Maybe that's the direction to go.

Have them spend all their ill gotten gains on something useful for once.

PS. I never send letters to the government, unless they write me first. I'd rather pretend I'm not here.

28 posted on 09/12/2006 9:08:37 AM PDT by I still care ("Remember... for it is the doom of men that they forget" - Merlin, from Excalibur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DocFarmer

I agree with you. They are in violation. The letter sounds good to me and sure cannot hurt.


29 posted on 09/12/2006 9:11:13 AM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DocFarmer
Sheesh, what was I thinking? Please forgive me.
30 posted on 09/12/2006 9:15:16 AM PDT by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Dante3

These are the same loons saying Bush is the one abusing his power and violating civil liberties?? God help us all. If they ever control Congress and the presidency again I truly fear free speech will be eroded and more basic rights will disappear.


31 posted on 09/12/2006 9:15:39 AM PDT by TNCMAXQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: technomage
BUMP

BTW, for whatever reason, I am unable tor respond to several posts here but can to others.

32 posted on 09/12/2006 9:15:57 AM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: I still care

That won't work, because the ACFLU is funded by taxpayers (us). They attack free speech, they don't defend it.


33 posted on 09/12/2006 9:16:02 AM PDT by DocFarmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: DocFarmer
>>>I thought she didn't work there anymore...<<<

She doesn't, but she will be your Attorney General if the Dems win in 2008!

34 posted on 09/12/2006 9:19:48 AM PDT by HardStarboard (Hey, march some more - its helping get the wall built!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: DocFarmer
>>>I thought she didn't work there anymore...<<<

She doesn't, but she will be your Attorney General if the Dems win in 2008!

35 posted on 09/12/2006 9:19:52 AM PDT by HardStarboard (Hey, march some more - its helping get the wall built!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: HardStarboard

That thought is just too frightening to comprehend...


36 posted on 09/12/2006 9:21:03 AM PDT by DocFarmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: DocFarmer

The DOJ definitely won't get involved, as there was no overt action taken and the attempted extortion charge would be so politically hot that they would fear a backlash. However, you should definitely send this or a similar letter to the Senate Ethics Committee chairman (George Voinovich) and request that each of these Senators be formally censured (expulsion is probably too much to expect).


37 posted on 09/12/2006 9:51:36 AM PDT by Doug Loss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doug Loss

I'll be sure to add the Ethics Committee chair to the cc list. Should I also include the President Pro Tempore and Sergeant at Arms?


38 posted on 09/12/2006 9:53:00 AM PDT by DocFarmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Tiggs6

"Second, given that the letter was made available to the public and given that Senators all have attorneys available, I doubt that there is any case to be made."

A threat, an attempt to extort actions from someone, is not determined to be valid or invalid simply because it was made in public and those making the threat have lawyers.

There may be other reasons for which Doc's course of action will not bear fruit. Your reasons are not among them.


39 posted on 09/12/2006 9:54:04 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DocFarmer

You are not understanding my comment. I am not suggesting that your actions are illegal. You would be drawing the attention of the DOJ to potentially illegal actions. That is perfectly acceptable and is not a problem whether those actions are illegal or not.

I am suggesting a way to bolster your charge of "extortion" against the Senators. While their threats of Federal agency action are despicable, they are not illegal. However, if they suggested prosecution, then that could be viewed as either "prior restraint" or threatening prosecution, which is illegal.


40 posted on 09/12/2006 9:57:30 AM PDT by the_Watchman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson