Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SuziQ
Terrorists could target them. They would become targets in an all out war, and as safe as they are there is always the possibility of something unexpected going wrong, whether caused by an accident or some natural disaster like an earthquake, or an intentional act. I feel like my family is safer living far away from any nuclear power plants. Odds are high that no one currently living near a nuclear plant will ever be affected by a nuclear disaster, but the risk for them is certainly greater than it is for those who don't live anywhere near one. Those living near nuclear power plants have one additional risk my family does not have.

Like I said though I probably wouldn't live in a big city like New York City either. That place is a major target for terrorists and it would be a major target in an all out war. I probably wouldn't live in a place like San Francisco either because aside from being a target, that area is prone to major earthquakes. Others are free to live in those places if they want, and if they want nuclear power plants there or anywhere else that's fine by me too, just as long as it's not near where I live. I'd be opposed to one going up anywhere near my hometown. Maybe I'm being overly cautious on this, but that's the way it's going to be for me.

I'm not opposed to nuclear power, just leery of it. The more plants that are built around the world the greater the likelihood there will be accidents, or natural disasters, or man made events at nuclear plants that lead to disastrous consequences. The more nuclear waste generated around the world and shipped here and there for storage, the greater the likelihood of major contaminations that could negatively affect us in a major way. And of course there is the problem of nuclear weapons. The more nuclear plants there out there the easier it will be for bad guys to enrich nuclear materials to weapons grade quality, or at least for bad guys to gain access to that material enriched by those who were more or less the good guys. I do not believe that we or the international community at large are capable of 100% effectiveness in policing nuclear activity throughout the world. Irresponsible zealots of some sort are going to get ahold of nuclear weapons at some point and cause a lot of problems with them. Sooner or later that's going to happen, and the more nuclear power plants there are throughout the world the sooner it will be.
63 posted on 09/14/2006 8:49:06 AM PDT by TKDietz (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: TKDietz
Terrorists could target them.

I'd rather have a compact reactor to defend than a monstrous LNG terminal (which is where we are heading).

I feel like my family is safer living far away from any nuclear power plants.

Contrary to your feelings nukes are far safer in terms of human life than coal mining or propane.

Remind me how many people were hurt in Three Mile Island?

ZERO. That's what you get when you design for the worst possible case, a core melt, which is a tractable problem.

67 posted on 09/14/2006 9:21:59 AM PDT by AdamSelene235 (Truth has become so rare and precious she is always attended to by a bodyguard of lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson