Posted on 09/12/2006 2:55:10 PM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran
Borrowing the title of a famous George Gershwin ditty, "they all laughed" when a Santa Fe, New Mexico family court judge granted a temporary restraining order (TRO) against TV talk show host David Letterman to protect a woman he had never met, never heard of, and lived 2,000 miles away from. Colleen Nestler claimed that Letterman had caused her "mental cruelty" and "sleep deprivation" for over a decade by using code words and gestures during his network TV broadcasts.
That ridiculous TRO was dismissed last December, but according to a new report released this week by RADAR (Respecting Accuracy in Domestic Abuse Reporting), the case was not a judicial anomaly but "the logical culmination of years of ever-expanding definitions of domestic violence." RADAR is a Maryland-based think tank that specializes in exposing the excesses of the domestic violence bureaucracy.
The New Mexico statute defines domestic violence as causing "severe emotional distress." That definition was met when Ms. Nestler claimed she suffered from exhaustion and had gone bankrupt because of Letterman's actions.
The New Mexico statute appears to limit domestic violence to "any incident by a household member," and Letterman, who lives in Connecticut and works in New York, had never been in Ms. Nestler's household. But New Mexico law defines household member to include "a person with whom the petitioner has had a continuing personal relationship," and Ms. Nestler's charge that Letterman's broadcast of television messages for eleven years qualified as a "continuing" relationship and thereby turned him into a "household member."
The family court judge who issued the TRO, Daniel Sanchez, may have been predisposed to believe any allegation presented to him by a complaining woman even though she had no evidence. His own biography lists him as chairman of the Northern New Mexico Domestic Violence Task Force.
(Excerpt) Read more at eagleforum.org ...
Argh, stop stalking me! ;-)
Only if you've invited her into your household every time she starts mugging for the cameras and spewing her bile.
And I suspect that you are WAY smarter than THAT! ;)
The demand end of the economic chain is the fact that women know (and their lawyers advise them) that making allegations of domestic violence (even without proof or evidence) is the fastest and cheapest way to win child custody plus generous financial support. The financial incentives to lie or exaggerate are powerful.
Due process violations in the issuing of TROs include lack of notice, no presumption of innocence, denial of poor defendants to free counsel while women are given taxpayer-funded support, denial of the right to take depositions, lack of evidentiary hearings, improper standard of proof, no need to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, denial of the right to confront accusers, and denial of trial by jury.
Dang, that is frightening. I'm glad my wife loves me.
That's not what she told me.....
Just kiddin.......
Feed us some elk
Get a TRO against the person who tied her up, taped her eyes open, and turned on Letterman every day.
Or just don't watch.
Must be a liberal.
It's really California.
That's it...I'm getting a restraining order against you!
lol
Hmmmm... Letterman has a restraining order in his record somewhere. Does this mean he couldn't get a license to carry if he were so inclined? Or does celebrity status trump problems like this, although it might not for you or me?
Yes, and if I'm not mistaken if you have a domestic violence restraining order against you, you automatically become inelligable to own guns and to avoid being an insta-felon must sell or otherwise get rid of them.
Pretty cool, eh. (/sarcasm)
I'm getting a temporary restraining order against you, too!
A few years ago I purchased a long gun for a Christmas gift.
One of the questions was are you currently the subject of a Restraining Order? I don't remember if it specified Domestic Violence or not.
Missouri does have some laws on the books passed in the 1990's when such legislation was in vogue. One example was that past convictions for domestic violence could be used as evidence in a later case.
I do know that in divorce cases, the attorney for the wife will have a restraining order issued as a routine matter. No history or proof of any type of violence was needed to get it issued.
The clerk that sold me the gun said it had stopped a friend of his from deer hunting, during the time of a divorce.
Perhaps David Letterman can not buy a gun or carry a gun for hunting or other purposes due to the fact this restraining order has been issued.
I think that it is not just a Missouri thing but also happens in other states as well.
This may not be very funny to Letterman after all.
Experts, what say you ?
Maybe the order was issued so the nutcase woman would shut up and leave the police, the State's attorney and the judges alone.
It probably would have been easier just to tell her that if she sprinkled crushed garlic in front of her TV, Letterman's nefarious schemes could not penetrate her mind.
You can thank Sens. Biden and Lautenberg for VAWA which pours billions$ into the "domestic violence industry".
This was after his wife had him beat up and hospitalized for almost a week.
This was after his wife tried to knife him in front of half a dozen witnesses.
This was after the divorce.
He was lucky to be alive and able to clear his name.
The Legacy of the Clinton's (plural as in two)
Huh when did the capital of New Mexico secede to California?
Sensible people just envisioned deeding it over there.
It's the rarefied air there.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.