Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GMMAC

"Mr Bush, much the less eloquent of the two.."

Mr Bush's speeches have been far better than Tony Blairs.


4 posted on 09/13/2006 8:46:21 AM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: pissant

Since the alternative would be to say that Ahmadinejad, Zawahiri, et al. do speak legitimately for Islam, I don't see why anyone should object to the term "Islamofascist".

What I don't understand is why anyone thinks the Iranian Monkey and te rest of the IslamoWhackos are not correctly representing Islam.

The Saudi's Wahibi Islam is being taught in America in mosques across America which are largely paid for by teh Saudi's.

For Libroids, that means with American money extorted by the Saudi's.


8 posted on 09/13/2006 8:58:59 AM PDT by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon Liberty, it is essential to examine principles, - -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: pissant
"Mr Bush's speeches have been far better than Tony Blair's."

While it's personal preference & I'd agree with you, perhaps Tony gets this little bone because, without his oratory talent & being right on the WOT, he's otherwise a clone of Mrs. Clinton.
Britain's ever-growing nanny state under Blair & Labor is the proverbial child-raising 'village' of her dreams.
11 posted on 09/13/2006 9:11:59 AM PDT by GMMAC (Discover Canada governed by Conservatives: www.CanadianAlly.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

So many complaining President Bush is not a great communicator, it's odd to me they have no problem explaining what he has said.
Nothing works better than just plain English.
I'm sure if the president wanted to use big words, his speech writers could easily insert them.
After all, there are more of us every day people voting than English professors.


25 posted on 09/13/2006 12:17:06 PM PDT by buck61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: pissant; GMMAC

<< "Mr Bush, much the less eloquent of the two.."

Mr Bush's speeches have been far better than Tony Blair >>

Absolutely.

The dedicated socialist, Anthony Charles Lynton "Tony" Blair, stands with one jack-booted foot and one side of his head facing and talking to his Euro-peon Neo-Axis masters. And the other, point-shoe-clad, foot and one of his faces turned and simultaneously talking toward the West.


36 posted on 09/13/2006 3:45:59 PM PDT by Brian Allen ("Moral issues are always terribly complex, for someone without principles." - G K Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: pissant
Mr Bush's speeches have been far better than Tony Blairs.

True, and President Bush has AT LEAST the equal of Blair in the press conferences they've shared...The President would have rocked Question time imo!

But the press-- including much of the conservative press--- started with the idea that Bush is dumb (and/or inarticulate) and nothing will ever change that he is for them.
56 posted on 09/13/2006 6:27:22 PM PDT by mjolnir ("All great change in America begins at the dinner table.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson