Prop 88 - The Netflix tax
1 posted on
09/14/2006 8:10:05 AM PDT by
SmithL
To: SmithL
Only $50? Like the minimum wage, why not ten times that number. People who own property are rich. After all, if they have property, they must have money. It is just as much trouble to get the voters to approve a $500 parcel tax as it is for a $50 tax. Besides, if the $50 tax were to pass, it would soon not be enough and we will just have to go back to the voters and demand more.
To: SmithL
Rich multimillionaire liberals again seeking to raise taxes on California homeowners instead of themselves.
Solution, save $$$ by dropping Netflix and checkout the videos available at your local library. My library in San Diego has a wide selection and can order videos that are not in the local branch. Why subsidize tax and spend limousine liberals like Hastings?
3 posted on
09/14/2006 8:50:44 AM PDT by
Howard Jarvis Admirer
(Howard Jarvis, the foe of the tax collector and friend of the California homeowner)
To: SmithL
Its a regressive tax. And a statewide property tax that would authorize facilities money to go to just 5% of your kids' schools! Its a TAX INCREASE and its DOA. Reed Hastings and John Doerr have chosen the worst means of furthering public education in California with a poorly written measure that has virtually everyone against it. Vote
NO on Proposition 88!
(No more Olmert! No more Kadima! No more Oslo! )
4 posted on
09/14/2006 8:32:16 PM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson