Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Steel Wolf
A bigger Army allows us more options-the simple military dictum that covers this is that "it is better to have it and not need it than to need it and not have it".

Rummy has resisted increasing the size of the Army because he is enthralled with the arguments of the "transformationists". Part of the way that he is trying to address this problem is in how he has reorganized the Army into brigade combat teams. This is a good reform, but we probably should have added another 100,000 actives to the Army and Marines after 9/11 (and provided whatever incentives needed to get up to that strength). It doesn't help that it often seems like he is playing chess without looking at the pieces.

19 posted on 09/15/2006 8:26:54 AM PDT by 91B (God made man, Sam Colt made men equal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: 91B

Rummy can resist all he wants if Congress authorized 1 or 100,000 more troops he would have to eat them. He is not the final word on this issue.

The question is can we add another 100,000 troops in an essentially full employment economy without increasing the pay substantially (50+%) to get the recruits or going to a draft.


20 posted on 09/15/2006 10:31:20 AM PDT by DHerion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson