Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China Losing More Manufacturing Jobs Than U.S.
RTO on line ^ | 9/15/06 | Mikey_1962

Posted on 09/15/2006 2:00:01 PM PDT by Mikey_1962

China is losing more manufacturing jobs than the United States. For the entire economy between 1995 and 2002, China lost 15 million manufacturing jobs, compared with 2 million in the U.S., The Conference Board reports in a study released today.

“As its manufacturing productivity accelerates, China is losing jobs in manufacturing – many more than the United States is – and gaining them in services, a pattern that has been playing out in the developed world for many years,” concludes The Conference Board study.

According to Robert H. McGuckin, Director of Economic Research at The Conference Board and co-author of the study: “Increased unemployment has also accompanied the restructuring of the industrial sector, but per capita income has risen over the period.”

The new report from The Conference Board, the global research and business membership network, is the result of a joint research project with The National Bureau of Statistics of China. The study is based on data for the 51,000 large and medium sized firms in China’s manufacturing, mining and the utilities industries. While the study focuses on the larger firms, according to McGuckin, “the same patterns are observed among smaller firms.”

advertise here

China is rapidly losing manufacturing jobs in the same industries where the U.S. and other major countries have seen jobs disappear, such as textiles. Matthew Spiegelman, Economist at The Conference Board and co-author of the study, notes: “The U.S. lost 202,000 textile jobs between 1995 and 2002, a tremendous decline by any measure. But China lost far more jobs in this sector –1.8 million. All told, 26 of China’s 38 major industries registered job losses between 1995 and 2002.”

The study points out that while developed countries’ jobs are being offshored to China, exports are only one piece of China’s industrial expansion.

(Excerpt) Read more at rtoonline.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS:
After the FORD news I had a discussion with a fellow worker who did not believe me that manufacturing job loss is worldwide. This article is dated but still on point.
1 posted on 09/15/2006 2:00:03 PM PDT by Mikey_1962
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mikey_1962

The percentage of manufacturing versus service sector jobs in the US never had anything to do with export/import (which always balances.)

The constant change toward service sector jobs is because manufacturing continues to get more efficient ALLOWING the luxury of affording service sector services.

The slope of change in the US has been unchanged for the last 100 years -- regardless of changes in export/import conditions.

China can't change the laws of economics either. Their manufacturing operations will get more efficient and they'll be able to afford more services -- hence the expansion of the service sector and the decline of the manufacturing sector -- employment wise.


2 posted on 09/15/2006 2:13:21 PM PDT by Dracian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mikey_1962

China is also losing business to shops set up in places with even lower wages, such as Vietnam.


3 posted on 09/15/2006 2:15:13 PM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
China’s industrial growth comes from both the downsizing and restructuring of government firms and the upsizing of foreign and foreign-invested firms

government firms

These are the worthless, Mao-era "enterprises" where the people pretend to work and the government pretends to pay them.

These "enterprises" are the reason for Chi-com banks having hundreds of billions in non-performing "loans."

Perhaps the Chi-coms would shut down all the remaining tens of thousands of "enterprises" except for one pesky thing: REVOLUTION.

over 12 million ["jobs"] lost between 1995 and 2002

12 million pissed-off masses -- and about 800 million angry peasants left out of the useful-idiot financed boom in the special economic zones (SEZ).

The maroons are comparing apples and t-rds when juxtaposing western industry to Mao's workers' paradise "enterprises."

4 posted on 09/15/2006 2:17:51 PM PDT by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mikey_1962

The classic wild geese argument. Investment/ industry in low skill sectors move from one country to another.


5 posted on 09/15/2006 2:22:18 PM PDT by paudio (Universal Human Rights and Multiculturalism: Liberals want to have cake and eat it too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mikey_1962
While U.S. auto sales have been relatively stable (between 16.6 million and 17.1 million since 2001), Ford sales have declined by nearly 21% in that five year period.
6 posted on 09/15/2006 2:34:55 PM PDT by BW2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dracian

Does any see a parallel between the loss of manufacturing jobs and the loss of agricultural work in the past?


7 posted on 09/15/2006 2:58:29 PM PDT by Red Dog #1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mikey_1962
After the FORD news I had a discussion with a fellow worker who did not
believe me that manufacturing job loss is worldwide.


Sorry I can't give you a citation...
but about 15 years ago, Scientific American had an article about
increased productivity in manufacturing.
It included a chart that showed the number of man-hours to produce a gun
at Beretta during the period when more modern equipment was introduced
(this was in the mid-1800s, IIRC).
The drop was precipitous.

Their displaced workers were lucky that the could make the get-away to the USA...
Even if they came here and ended up digging a ditch or working in a mine
(as some did in SE Oklahoma).
8 posted on 09/15/2006 3:05:57 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theBuckwheat

>China is also losing business to ships set up in places with even lower wages, such as Vietnam.<

North or South, need I ask?


9 posted on 09/15/2006 3:56:23 PM PDT by Paperdoll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Dog #1
Does any see a parallel between the loss of manufacturing jobs and the loss of agricultural work in the past?

Yes, and for the same reasons. Farming employment went from 30% to 3% of the population in the last century due to mechanization (efficiency).
10 posted on 09/15/2006 7:45:51 PM PDT by Mikey_1962 (If you build it, they won't come...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: paudio

True, but that does not account for the WORLDWIDE drop in manufacturing jobs.

Every country in the world has lost manufacturing jobs in the last 10 years due to more efficient use of automation, and robotization.


11 posted on 09/16/2006 3:40:20 PM PDT by Mikey_1962 (If you build it, they won't come...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson