[MindBender26]

No chance.

Nelson has not spent one dollar, had no primary opponent, ergo, no face time and has not spent one dollar on ads. In addition, he has huge incumbent war chest.

Harris had to spend her funds to defeat a bunch of unknowns in primary.

Final; 65-31 at best.

Sorry, but true.

[Rome2000]

65-31 is a little severe, more like 56-38.

On a lighter note, there is an Easter Bunny and Santa Claus lives at the North Pole.

[ChildOfThe60s]

Unfortunately, I agree.

I like her, but in the real world she has no chance.

Nelson is way out in left field, but with help from the media has successfully painted himself as a "moderate". Just like wacko Bob Graham.

[marc costanzo]

>>Nelson has not spent one dollar, had no primary opponent, ergo, no face time and has not spent one dollar on ads. In addition, he has huge incumbent war chest.

Harris had to spend her funds to defeat a bunch of unknowns in primary.

Final; 65-31 at best.
Sorry, but true.

<<

I question your numbers .

"Nelson has not spent a dollar, Nelson has spent only a dollar" - - blaghhh, nonsense !

MORE IMPORTANTLY, if Harris can duplicate these recent numbers in some other independent poll, then she's definitely moving upward and Nelson is moving downward .

Rep Katherine Harris does have a chance of victory .

As slim as it may be, as far an uphill fight she has got in front of her- - she can still win .

[OPS4]

Bull, Her base is allready established, thats why she won the primary, Her ost of advertising was low because she saved 10 million for Nelson.

Get the facts, and Watch Nelson Melt Down.

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

Nelson has not spent one dollar, had no primary opponent, ergo, no face time and has not spent one dollar on ads. In addition, he has huge incumbent war chest.

Cash advantage does not correlate into political victory.